PRA Letter Reinforces Need for Compliance with Rule on Board Diversity
PRA published a letter reinforcing the importance of Board diversity for improving decision-making and reminding firms to comply with the PRA rules in this area. The letter, which is written by the PRA Executive Directors for international bank, deposit-taker, and insurance supervision, is addressed to the Chairs of Solvency II insurers, large non-directive firms, and Capital Requirement Regulation (CRR) firms, is a reminder of the requirement to comply with PRA rules in this area. The letter states that diverse boards, made up of members with different skills, knowledge, experience, and values will support different perspectives being brought to discussion on business operations and risk strategy.
As noted in Supervisory Statement SS5/16, titled "Corporate governance: Board responsibilities," PRA expects boards to have the diversity of experience and capacity to provide effective challenge across the full range of the business. The letter highlights that the publication of EBA report on the benchmarking of diversity practices in February 2020 showed that 70% of the sampled UK credit institutions and investment firms have a policy in place for promoting diversity on the management body. While this showed is a substantial progress since 2015, when only 15% of the sampled UK credit institutions and investment firms reported having such a policy, compliance is still not universal. Following the initial EBA benchmarking report, PRA extended these requirements to insurers in April 2018 and now all Capital Requirement Regulation (CRR) firms, Solvency II firms, and large non-Directive firms are required to engage a "broad set of qualities and competencies when recruiting to the management/governing body." Significant credit institutions and investment firms, which are required to have a nominations committee, must also set a target for the under-represented gender in the management body. Firms must also explain on their website how they comply with the respective requirements.
According to the letter, Chairs of these firms should see that their firm is meeting the PRA requirements and take remedial action where required. In doing so, Chairs (and, where appropriate, Chairs of the Nomination Committee) should consider the extent to which the diversity policy is embedded in recruitment and succession planning for the board, to support constructive debate and challenge on the range of issues facing the firm. Chairs should expect to discuss this with their supervisors through the course of normal supervisory dialog.
Related Link: Letter
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Insurance, Solvency II, CRR, ESG, Governance, Board Diversity, PRA, BoE
Featured Experts
Adam Koursaris
Asset and liability management expert; capable modeler; risk and capital specialist
Cassandra Hannibal
Life insurance actuary; risk management and economic capital specialist
Jerome Ogrodzki
Insurance asset and liabilities modeling specialist; stochastic modeling expert
Related Articles
OSFI Issues Results of Pilot on Climate Risk Scenario Analysis
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an update on the discussion paper that intended to engage federally regulated financial institutions and other interested stakeholders in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns.
EC Issues Regulation on Adjustments to K-Factor Coefficients Under IFR
The European Commission (EC) published a report summarizing responses to the targeted consultation on the supervisory convergence and the single rulebook in the European Union (EU).
ECB Issues Opinions on Green Bonds Standard and CRR Proposals
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on a proposal for a regulation on European green bonds, following a request from the European Parliament.
ESRB Explores Policy Response to Risks Arising from Digitalization
The Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that explores the expected impact of digitalization on provision of financial and banking services, and proposes policy measures to address the risks stemming from digitalization.
HKMA Consults on FIRO Code, Revises Policy on Foreign Exchange Risk
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is consulting on the draft Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628), or FIRO, Code of Practice chapter on liquidity and funding in resolution, until March 14, 2022.
FI Publishes Multiple Regulatory and Reporting Updates
The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FI) announced that the capital adequacy reporting as at December 31, 2021 must be done by February 11, 2022.
EU Authorities Address COVID-19 Reporting, MCD, and PSD2 Issues
The European Banking Authority (EBA) announced that the guidelines on the reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures COVID-relief measures shall continue to apply until further notice.
BSP Tackles Aspects of Lending and Islamic, Open & Sustainable Finance
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
US Agencies Issue Regulatory Updates, FDIC Launches Tech Sprint
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
EBA Issues Guide on Bank Resolvability, Consults on Transferability
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).
