PRA published a letter reinforcing the importance of Board diversity for improving decision-making and reminding firms to comply with the PRA rules in this area. The letter, which is written by the PRA Executive Directors for international bank, deposit-taker, and insurance supervision, is addressed to the Chairs of Solvency II insurers, large non-directive firms, and Capital Requirement Regulation (CRR) firms, is a reminder of the requirement to comply with PRA rules in this area. The letter states that diverse boards, made up of members with different skills, knowledge, experience, and values will support different perspectives being brought to discussion on business operations and risk strategy.
As noted in Supervisory Statement SS5/16, titled "Corporate governance: Board responsibilities," PRA expects boards to have the diversity of experience and capacity to provide effective challenge across the full range of the business. The letter highlights that the publication of EBA report on the benchmarking of diversity practices in February 2020 showed that 70% of the sampled UK credit institutions and investment firms have a policy in place for promoting diversity on the management body. While this showed is a substantial progress since 2015, when only 15% of the sampled UK credit institutions and investment firms reported having such a policy, compliance is still not universal. Following the initial EBA benchmarking report, PRA extended these requirements to insurers in April 2018 and now all Capital Requirement Regulation (CRR) firms, Solvency II firms, and large non-Directive firms are required to engage a "broad set of qualities and competencies when recruiting to the management/governing body." Significant credit institutions and investment firms, which are required to have a nominations committee, must also set a target for the under-represented gender in the management body. Firms must also explain on their website how they comply with the respective requirements.
According to the letter, Chairs of these firms should see that their firm is meeting the PRA requirements and take remedial action where required. In doing so, Chairs (and, where appropriate, Chairs of the Nomination Committee) should consider the extent to which the diversity policy is embedded in recruitment and succession planning for the board, to support constructive debate and challenge on the range of issues facing the firm. Chairs should expect to discuss this with their supervisors through the course of normal supervisory dialog.
Related Link: Letter
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Insurance, Solvency II, CRR, ESG, Governance, Board Diversity, PRA, BoE
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.