MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The paper covers operational risks associated with outsourcing and other third-party arrangements, along with risks in the areas of information/data governance, cybersecurity, fraud and staff misconduct, and legal and regulatory compliance. The paper shares good practices adopted by financial institutions to mitigate such risks and encourages institutions to adopt these risk-mitigation practices on a risk-proportionate basis, according to their risk profiles and business activities. The mitigation practices set out in the paper are also applicable to non-bank financial institutions.
The paper predominantly focuses on the areas of risks where changes, due to remote working, have a direct impact on the risks and risk management challenges faced by financial institutions (referred to as direct risks). However, poorly managed direct risks of remote working could lead to heightened risks in areas that may not be directly impacted by remote working (referred to as indirect risks). The paper provides examples of indirect credit, market, and reputational risks. For instance, changes in validation processes that are conducted for credit assessment and monitoring purposes, such as replacement of customer site visits (for example, to ascertain existence of collateral pledged) with customer calls, could affect the ability of a financial institution to identify red flags in customer circumstances. The paper sets out the key actions that financial institutions are encouraged to adopt to manage remote working risks and these actions include the following:
- With respect to establishing appropriate internal control mechanisms, financial institutions are encouraged to implement compensating controls to manage identified risks within risk appetite statements approved by Board and senior management. Financial institutions are also encouraged to adopt robust change management procedures so that staff members understand and implement the new processes and controls as intended.
- With respect to outsourcing and other third-party arrangements, financial institutions should evaluate changes to vendor risk profiles with remote working, such as by assessing vendors’ remote working controls and operational resilience. Financial institutions should also implement appropriate safeguards and contingency plans to ensure continuity of services.
- For appropriate data/information governance, financial institutions should assess the risks and implications of information loss when determining which activities can be performed remotely. Financial institutions need to strengthen preventive and detective controls to mitigate these risks.
- To mitigate cyber risk, financial institutions are encouraged to implement controls to ensure that remote working infrastructure of staff, including personal devices, are secured. Financial institutions should also continue to adopt sound and robust technology risk management practices, to manage hardware and software deployed to facilitate large-scale remote working, including during the pandemic.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Insurance, Securities, COVID-19, Operational Risk, Operational Resilience, Technology Risk, Cyber Risk, Outsourcing Arrangements, Internal Controls, MAS
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has responded to the IFRS consultation on targeted amendments to the IFRS Foundation constitution to accommodate an International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) to set IFRS Sustainability Standards.