AMF published the guideline on margins for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives not cleared by a central counterparty (CCP). The guideline sets out expectations of AMF regarding the exchange of margin for non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives (covered derivatives). This guideline applies to a covered institution that trades covered derivatives with a covered counterparty. The effective dates of the expectations for the exchange of variation margin and initial margin are March 01, 2020 and September 01, 2021, respectively.
As per the guideline, a local institution belonging to a financial group whose aggregate month-end average gross notional amount of outstanding covered derivatives for March, April, and May of a given year exceeds USD 12 billion becomes a covered institution as of September 01 of that year. From that date until August 31 of the following year, the guideline will apply to all new covered derivatives traded with a covered counterparty. However, AMF does not expect initial margin expectations to be met for existing covered derivatives. AMF expects all covered institutions to have appropriate margining practices in place for all covered derivatives traded with a covered counterparty, with the exception of:
- physically settled foreign exchange forwards
- cross-currency swaps
- fixed physically settled foreign exchange transactions associated with the exchange of principal of cross-currency swaps
Conversely, a covered institution belonging to a financial group whose aggregate month-end average gross notional amount of outstanding covered derivatives for March, April, and May of a given year falls below USD 12 billion ceases to be a covered institution. From that time on, the guideline will not apply to any covered derivative involving the institution, regardless of the date on which the derivative was traded, until such time as the institution has recovered its status as a covered institution. The same holds true for a covered counterparty.
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Securities, OTC Derivatives, Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives, CCPs, Margin Requirements, Initial Margin, Variation Margin, AMF
Previous ArticlePRA Finalizes Approach to Supervising Liquidity and Funding Risks
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.