Featured Product

    FED Releases Results of Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review

    June 28, 2018

    FED released results of the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). The results show that, out of the 35 participating firms, FED objected to the capital plan from DB USA Corporation due to qualitative concerns. The concerns include material weaknesses in the firm's data capabilities and controls supporting its capital planning process as well as weaknesses in the approaches and assumptions used to forecast revenues and losses under stress.

    FED issued a conditional non-objection to the capital plans of both Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley and both firms will maintain their capital distributions at the levels they paid in recent years, which will allow them to build capital over the next year. Each firm's capital ratios, under the capital plans they originally submitted and with the one-time capital reduction from the tax law changes, fell below required levels when subjected to the hypothetical scenario. This one-time reduction does not reflect a firm's performance under stress and firms can expect higher post-tax earnings going forward. FED also issued a conditional non-objection for the capital plan from State Street Corporation. The stress test revealed counterparty exposures that produced large losses under the hypothetical scenario, which assumes the default of a firm's largest counterparty under stress. The firm will be required to take certain steps regarding the management and analysis of its counterparty exposures under stress.

    FED did not object to the capital plans of Ally Financial, Inc.; American Express Company; BB&T Corporation; BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.; BMO Financial Corp.; BNP Paribas USA; Bank of America Corporation; The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation; Barclays US LLC.; Capital One Financial Corporation; Citigroup, Inc.; Citizens Financial Group; Credit Suisse Holdings (USA); Discover Financial Services; Fifth Third Bancorp; HSBC North America Holdings, Inc.; Huntington Bancshares, Inc.; JP Morgan Chase & Co.; Keycorp; M&T Bank Corporation; MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation; Northern Trust Corp.; The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.; RBC USA Holdco Corporation; Regions Financial Corporation; Santander Holdings USA, Inc.; SunTrust Banks, Inc.; TD Group US Holdings LLC; U.S. Bancorp; UBS Americas Holdings LLC; and Wells Fargo & Company.

    CCAR, in its eighth year, evaluates the capital planning processes and capital adequacy of the largest U.S.-based bank holding companies, including the firms' planned capital actions, such as dividend payments and share buybacks. This year, 18 of the largest and most complex banks were subject to both the quantitative and qualitative assessments. The 17 other firms in CCAR were subject only to the quantitative assessment. FED may object to a capital plan based on quantitative or qualitative concerns.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, CCAR, Stress Testing, DFAST, FED

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    FDIC Releases Economic Scenarios for Stress Testing in 2020

    FDIC released the hypothetical economic scenarios for use in the upcoming stress tests for covered institutions with total consolidated assets of more than USD 250 billion.

    February 14, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Acknowledges EC Adoption of Amended Supervisory Reporting Standard

    EBA acknowledged the adoption, by EC, of an Implementing Act with regard to the common reporting (COREP) and financial reporting (FINREP) changes, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR.

    February 14, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA and ASIC Welcome Proposed Reforms for Superannuation Sector

    APRA and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) have jointly welcomed the proposed legislative reforms increasing the role of ASIC in the superannuation sector.

    February 14, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Responds to EC Consultation on Review of Benchmarks Regulation

    ESMA published its response to EC consultation on review of the Benchmarks Regulation in EU.

    February 14, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ISDA Guide on Smart Contracts for Equity and Interest Rate Derivatives

    ISDA has published the fourth and fifth installments in a series of legal guidelines for smart derivatives contracts.

    February 13, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Paper Describes FLARE, A Top-Down Model for Stress Testing

    FED published a technical paper that describes the Forward-Looking Analysis of Risk Events (FLARE) model.

    February 13, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Rule Updates Data for Calculations Under Solvency II Reporting

    EC published the Implementing Regulation 2020/193, which lays down technical information for the calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds for reporting with reference dates from December 31, 2019 to March 30, 2020, in accordance with the Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC).

    February 13, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Publishes Supervisory Convergence Plan and Suptech Strategy

    EIOPA published the strategies for cyber underwriting and supervisory technology (suptech), in response to the evolving insurance landscape.

    February 12, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Proposes Guide on Sectoral Exposures to Apply Systemic Risk Buffer

    EBA launched a consultation on the guidelines on appropriate subsets of sectoral exposures to which competent or designated authorities may apply a systemic risk buffer (SyRB), in accordance with the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).

    February 12, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ISDA Paper Outlines Developments on Risk-Free Rate Adoption in 2020

    ISDA published a research paper that examines several major upcoming developments on the adoption of risk-free rates in 2020.

    February 12, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4676