ESRB Issues Opinion on Stricter Macro-Prudential Measure by Sweden
ESRB published its opinion on the Swedish notification of a stricter national measure on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms, based on Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or EU Regulation No 575/2013). The measure implies an average risk-weight floor of 25% on the Swedish mortgage exposure portfolios of the internal ratings-based (IRB) banks. ESRB opines that the stricter measure is justified, suitable, proportionate, effective, and efficient.
Finansinspektionen, acting as designated authority for the purpose of Article 458 of CRR, notified ESRB) on May 24, 2018 of its intention to apply a stricter national measure for credit institutions using the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach. The draft stricter national measure concerns risk-weights for targeting asset bubbles in the residential property sector. It consists of the imposition, on all domestic IRB credit institutions, of a credit institution-specific minimum level (floor) of 25% for the exposure-weighted average risk-weight on retail exposures in Sweden secured by immovable property. The draft stricter national measure should come into force on December 31, 2018. To assess the draft stricter national measure notified by Finansinspektionen, the ESRB assessment team referred to in Decision ESRB/2015/4 issued an assessment note.
ESRB believes that the announced structural changes in the Swedish banking sector may reduce the effectiveness of macro-prudential instruments currently in force in Sweden, in particular the macro-prudential use of Pillar 2, which can lead to changes in the intensity of macro-prudential or systemic risks arising from the residential real estate sector of such nature as to pose risk to financial stability at national level. The draft stricter national measure does not entail disproportionate adverse effects on the whole or parts of the financial system in other member states or in EU; the issue concerns only one member state. The risks will not be addressed by other measures in CRR or CRD IV. The draft stricter national measure does not have a negative impact on the internal market that outweighs the financial stability benefits resulting in a reduction of the macro-prudential or systemic risks identified.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, Sweden, Banking, Macro-prudential Policy, IRB Approach, Mortgage Exposure, CRR, Systemic Risk, ESRB
Featured Experts
Blake Coules
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Previous Article
FDIC to Focus on Overseeing Fintech Revolution, Launches Tech LabRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.