At the 11th Symposium on Asian Banking and Finance in San Francisco, Jeremy Rudin of OSFI spoke about the impact of data science on supervision of financial institutions. He believes data science will have a major impact on the supervision of financial institutions. Supervisors need to understand what data science can and cannot do to assist them. If they fail to understand how to use data science wisely, they will fail to gain the full benefits of these powerful techniques.
Mr. Rudin highlighted that “professions like prudential supervision, which rely heavily on judgment and experience, tend to resist the idea that algorithms can improve on what human expertise can accomplish alone. That is a mistake and we cannot afford to make that mistake.” He discussed the way data science will change the practices of supervisors of financial institutions. He first gave example to demonstrate how data science can apply to the work in conduct supervision—specifically detecting and prosecuting illegal insider trading. Next, he exemplified the applications of data science to the work of a prudential supervisor in reducing the likelihood of failures of large and complex banks.
Finally, he illustrated the issues that can be left unresolved by the current approach and explained the ways to harness the power of unsupervised machine learning to resolve such issues using the increasingly available granular data that supervisors are collecting. “By combining increased computing power with more granular data, we can increase the speed, accuracy, and level of detail of our existing data analysis. That is a step forward; perhaps it will be a big step forward,” he added.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: International, Canada, Banking, Regtech, Prudential Supervision, Machine Learning, Data Science, OSFI
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
PRA published updates in relation to the 2021 Supervisory Benchmarking Portfolio exercise.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100-0341).
HKMA revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.