European Parliament published a research paper that examines how demanding and consistent is the 2018 stress test design in comparison to the previous exercises. The 2018 EBA EU-wide stress test exercise is similar to previous exercises in terms of the employed methodology.
The major change compared to the 2016 exercise is that the 2018 exercise incorporates, for the first time, the IFRS 9 accounting standards, which contributes to the increased severity of the exercise. Accordingly, banks are requested to account for credit impairments associated with their riskier loans not only over a twelve-month period, but also in a lifetime horizon. The stress testing methodology also incorporates several measures to guarantee internal consistency. However, despite all the progress made in designing the exercise, there remain critical areas such as the application of a static-balance-sheet assumption, the under representation of liquidity risk, and the implications of the lack of a fail-pass threshold. The paper suggests that improvements in these areas can enhance reliability of stress test results and empower their role as external and internal communication tools.
EBA, in 2018, has required 48 significant banks covering roughly 70% of the banking sector assets in EU to perform a stress test to assess their resilience during 2018–2020. The exercise is based on a common methodology and a set of templates that capture starting point data (year-end 2017 figures) and stress test results. The results will be published on November 02, 2018. As in the 2016 exercise, there is no pass-fail threshold, but results will be input to the supervisory review and evaluation (SREP) process, under which decisions are made on appropriate capital resources and forward-looking capital plans. Similar to the 2016 exercise, the 2018 EU-wide stress test is based on common methodology and a “constrained bottom-up” approach,that is, banks make their projections but are subject to strict constraints and simplifying assumptions.
Related Link: Research Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Stress Testing, 2018 EU Stress Testing, ECL, IFRS 9, European Parliament, EBA
Previous ArticleEuropean Parliament Publishes Paper on Challenges on BRRD Valuations
BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.
PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.
PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
FCA announced proposals that would provide continued support for certain consumer credit products to users, who are facing a financial impact because of the exceptional circumstances arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR published a draft version of taxonomy RAN 1.4.0_PWD1, along with the related documentation, for Solvency II reporting.
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).