IASB published an article on preparing the market for the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts. The article examines what this standard means for the investor community. It provides an overview of IFRS 17, examines issues with IFRS 4 (the interim insurance contracts standard), analyzes benefits of IFRS 17, and discusses the worldwide impact of the standard.
IASB issued the IFRS 17 standard in 2017 and the standard comes into effect in 2021. The article establishes that the new standard represents a seismic change not only for the insurance companies that will use it but for the user community, particularly for analysts covering the sector worldwide. While many are expecting a turbulent bedding-in period when the standard first comes into effect, insurance analysts worldwide believe it will make a huge difference to the consistency, transparency, and comparability of insurance companies. The most critical question is likely to be whether IFRS 17 and the transparency and comparability it promises to bring will make the insurance sector a more attractive prospect for investors.
The impact of IFRS 17 is expected to be greater in some regions—such as those that routinely use historical interest rate information—than in others. In Asia and Europe, for example, embedded value reporting is voluntarily offered by many insurers to provide information on long-term contracts. While the information about the profitability of long-term contracts provided under IFRS 17 will be more comparable than embedded value reporting, moving away from embedded value will be a significant change for investors. Some analysts are concerned about transitional arrangements to the new standard and concerned that the format of key statements could differ from company to company.
Keywords: International, Insurance, Accounting, IFRS 17, Insurance Contracts, Comparability, Transparency, IASB
Previous ArticleIMF Publishes Reports on 2018 Article IV Consultation with Angola
BCBS is consulting on the principles for operational resilience and the revisions to the principles for sound management of operational risk for banks.
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
HKMA, together with the Banking Sector Small and Medium-Size Enterprise (SME) Lending Coordination Mechanism, announced a ninety-day repayment deferment for trade facilities under the Pre-approved Principal Payment Holiday Scheme.
The Advisory Scientific Committee of ESRB published a response, in the form of an Insights Paper, to the EBA proposals for reforms to the stress testing framework in EU.
MAS announced several initiatives to support adoption of the Singapore Overnight Rate Average (SORA), which is administered by MAS.
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.
PRA published the policy statement PS19/20 on the final policy for extending coverage under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) for Temporary High Balance.
EBA published the final draft implementing technical standards for disclosures and reporting on the minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) and the total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) requirements in EU.
EBA published an erratum for the phase 2 of technical package on the reporting framework 2.10.
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2020/1145, which lays down technical information for calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds.