IASB published an article on preparing the market for the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts. The article examines what this standard means for the investor community. It provides an overview of IFRS 17, examines issues with IFRS 4 (the interim insurance contracts standard), analyzes benefits of IFRS 17, and discusses the worldwide impact of the standard.
IASB issued the IFRS 17 standard in 2017 and the standard comes into effect in 2021. The article establishes that the new standard represents a seismic change not only for the insurance companies that will use it but for the user community, particularly for analysts covering the sector worldwide. While many are expecting a turbulent bedding-in period when the standard first comes into effect, insurance analysts worldwide believe it will make a huge difference to the consistency, transparency, and comparability of insurance companies. The most critical question is likely to be whether IFRS 17 and the transparency and comparability it promises to bring will make the insurance sector a more attractive prospect for investors.
The impact of IFRS 17 is expected to be greater in some regions—such as those that routinely use historical interest rate information—than in others. In Asia and Europe, for example, embedded value reporting is voluntarily offered by many insurers to provide information on long-term contracts. While the information about the profitability of long-term contracts provided under IFRS 17 will be more comparable than embedded value reporting, moving away from embedded value will be a significant change for investors. Some analysts are concerned about transitional arrangements to the new standard and concerned that the format of key statements could differ from company to company.
Keywords: International, Insurance, Accounting, IFRS 17, Insurance Contracts, Comparability, Transparency, IASB
Previous ArticleIMF Publishes Reports on 2018 Article IV Consultation with Angola
HKMA is consulting on revisions to the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
PRA provided further information on the application of regulatory capital and IFRS 9 requirements to payment holidays granted or extended to address the challenges arising from COVID-19 outbreak.
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.
ECB launched consultation on a guide specifying how the Banking Supervision expects banks to consider climate-related and environmental risks in their governance and risk management frameworks and when formulating and implementing their business strategy.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/16) on amendments to the prudential framework in EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA published a report that examines the interlinkages between recovery and resolution planning under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).
SRB published the final Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy under the Banking Package.
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) published a final rule that makes technical changes to the March 31, 2020 interim final rule that provides a five-year transition period for the impact of the current expected credit loss (CECL) methodology on regulatory capital.
ECB published results of the March 2020 survey on credit terms and conditions in euro-denominated securities financing and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.