IASB published an article on preparing the market for the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts. The article examines what this standard means for the investor community. It provides an overview of IFRS 17, examines issues with IFRS 4 (the interim insurance contracts standard), analyzes benefits of IFRS 17, and discusses the worldwide impact of the standard.
IASB issued the IFRS 17 standard in 2017 and the standard comes into effect in 2021. The article establishes that the new standard represents a seismic change not only for the insurance companies that will use it but for the user community, particularly for analysts covering the sector worldwide. While many are expecting a turbulent bedding-in period when the standard first comes into effect, insurance analysts worldwide believe it will make a huge difference to the consistency, transparency, and comparability of insurance companies. The most critical question is likely to be whether IFRS 17 and the transparency and comparability it promises to bring will make the insurance sector a more attractive prospect for investors.
The impact of IFRS 17 is expected to be greater in some regions—such as those that routinely use historical interest rate information—than in others. In Asia and Europe, for example, embedded value reporting is voluntarily offered by many insurers to provide information on long-term contracts. While the information about the profitability of long-term contracts provided under IFRS 17 will be more comparable than embedded value reporting, moving away from embedded value will be a significant change for investors. Some analysts are concerned about transitional arrangements to the new standard and concerned that the format of key statements could differ from company to company.
Keywords: International, Insurance, Accounting, IFRS 17, Insurance Contracts, Comparability, Transparency, IASB
Previous ArticleECB Opinion on Proposed Regulation on Minimum Loss Coverage for NPEs
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/763 that lays down implementing technical standards for supervisory reporting and public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
EBA published a report that examines the convergence of prudential supervisory practices in 2020 and offers conclusions of the EBA college monitoring activity.
APRA announced the standardization of quarterly reporting due dates for authorized deposit-taking institutions.
The private sector working group of ECB on euro risk-free rates published the recommendations to address events that would trigger fallbacks in the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR)-related contracts, along with the €STR-based EURIBOR fallback rates (rates that could be used if a fallback is triggered).
Bundesbank published a list of "EntryPoints" that are accepted in its reporting system; the list provides taxonomy version and name of the module against each EntryPoint.
EBA published the phase 1 of its reporting framework 3.1, with the technical package covering the new reporting requirements for investment firms (under the implementing technical standards on investment firms reporting).
The Sustainable Finance Taskforce of IOSCO held two roundtables, with global stakeholders, on the IOSCO priorities to enhance the reliability, comparability, and consistency of sustainability-related disclosures and to collect views on the practical implementation of a global system architecture for these disclosures.
Asia Pacific Australia Banking APS 111 Capital Adequacy Regulatory Capital Basel RBNZ APRA
ESMA published the final guidelines on outsourcing to cloud service providers.
EBA published annual data for two key concepts and indicators in the Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS) Directive—available financial means and covered deposits.