FHFA and the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) proposed a new regulatory capital framework for the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac)—collectively known as the Enterprises. The proposed rule would make certain conforming amendments to definitions in the FHFA regulations for assessments and minimum capital. It would also remove the OFHEO Regulation on capital for the Enterprises. Comments must be received on or before August 31, 2020.
This proposed rule is a re-proposal of the regulatory capital framework set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on July 17, 2018. The 2018 proposal, which remains the foundation of this proposed rule, contemplated risk-based capital requirements based on a granular assessment of credit risk specific to different mortgage loan categories as well as two alternatives for an updated leverage ratio requirement. The proposed rule contemplates a number of key enhancements to the 2018 proposal, including:
- Simplifications and refinements of the grids and risk multipliers for the credit risk capital requirements for single-family mortgage exposures, including removal of the single-family risk multipliers for loan balance and the number of borrowers
- A countercyclical adjustment to the credit risk capital requirements for single-family mortgage exposures
- A prudential floor on the credit risk capital requirement for mortgage exposures
- Refinements to the capital treatment of credit risk transfers structures, including a minimum capital requirement on senior tranches of credit risk transfers retained by an Enterprise and an adjustment to reflect that credit risk transfers does not have the same loss-absorbing capacity as equity capital
- The addition of a credit risk capital requirement for Enterprise cross-holdings of mortgage-backed securities
- Risk-based capital requirements for a number of other exposures not explicitly addressed by the 2018 proposal
- Supplemental capital requirements based on the Basel framework's definitions of total capital, tier 1 capital, and CET1 capital
- Capital buffers that would subject an Enterprise to increasing limits on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to the extent that its regulatory capital falls below the prescribed buffer amounts
- A stability capital buffer tailored to the risk that an Enterprise's default or other financial distress could have on the liquidity, efficiency, competitiveness, and resiliency of national housing finance markets
- A revised method for determining operational risk capital requirements, as well as a higher floor
- A requirement that each Enterprise maintain internal models for determining its own estimates of risk-based capital requirements
The regulatory capital framework contemplated by the proposed rule would require each Enterprise to maintain total capital of not less than 8.0% of risk-weighted assets, adjusted total capital of not less than 8.0% of risk-weighted assets, tier 1 capital of not less than 6.0% of risk-weighted assets, and common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital of not less than 4.5% of the risk-weighted assets. Each Enterprise would be also required to satisfy the following leverage ratios—core capital of not less than 2.5% of adjusted total assets and tier 1 capital of not less than 2.5% of the adjusted total assets.
Related Link: Federal Register Notice
Comment Due Date: August 31, 2020
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Regulatory Capital, CET 1, Basel, Credit Risk, Market Risk, Operational Risk, Leverage Ratio, Fannie Mae, Fannie Mac, FHFA
Previous ArticleFCA Extends Implementation Timeline for SM&CR Solo-Regulated Firms
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.