FHFA and the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) proposed a new regulatory capital framework for the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac)—collectively known as the Enterprises. The proposed rule would make certain conforming amendments to definitions in the FHFA regulations for assessments and minimum capital. It would also remove the OFHEO Regulation on capital for the Enterprises. Comments must be received on or before August 31, 2020.
This proposed rule is a re-proposal of the regulatory capital framework set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on July 17, 2018. The 2018 proposal, which remains the foundation of this proposed rule, contemplated risk-based capital requirements based on a granular assessment of credit risk specific to different mortgage loan categories as well as two alternatives for an updated leverage ratio requirement. The proposed rule contemplates a number of key enhancements to the 2018 proposal, including:
- Simplifications and refinements of the grids and risk multipliers for the credit risk capital requirements for single-family mortgage exposures, including removal of the single-family risk multipliers for loan balance and the number of borrowers
- A countercyclical adjustment to the credit risk capital requirements for single-family mortgage exposures
- A prudential floor on the credit risk capital requirement for mortgage exposures
- Refinements to the capital treatment of credit risk transfers structures, including a minimum capital requirement on senior tranches of credit risk transfers retained by an Enterprise and an adjustment to reflect that credit risk transfers does not have the same loss-absorbing capacity as equity capital
- The addition of a credit risk capital requirement for Enterprise cross-holdings of mortgage-backed securities
- Risk-based capital requirements for a number of other exposures not explicitly addressed by the 2018 proposal
- Supplemental capital requirements based on the Basel framework's definitions of total capital, tier 1 capital, and CET1 capital
- Capital buffers that would subject an Enterprise to increasing limits on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to the extent that its regulatory capital falls below the prescribed buffer amounts
- A stability capital buffer tailored to the risk that an Enterprise's default or other financial distress could have on the liquidity, efficiency, competitiveness, and resiliency of national housing finance markets
- A revised method for determining operational risk capital requirements, as well as a higher floor
- A requirement that each Enterprise maintain internal models for determining its own estimates of risk-based capital requirements
The regulatory capital framework contemplated by the proposed rule would require each Enterprise to maintain total capital of not less than 8.0% of risk-weighted assets, adjusted total capital of not less than 8.0% of risk-weighted assets, tier 1 capital of not less than 6.0% of risk-weighted assets, and common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital of not less than 4.5% of the risk-weighted assets. Each Enterprise would be also required to satisfy the following leverage ratios—core capital of not less than 2.5% of adjusted total assets and tier 1 capital of not less than 2.5% of the adjusted total assets.
Related Link: Federal Register Notice
Comment Due Date: August 31, 2020
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Regulatory Capital, CET 1, Basel, Credit Risk, Market Risk, Operational Risk, Leverage Ratio, Fannie Mae, Fannie Mac, FHFA
Previous ArticleFCA Extends Implementation Timeline for SM&CR Solo-Regulated Firms
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.