CFPB is issuing an interim final rule to amend the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) to temporarily permit mortgage servicers to offer certain loss-mitigation options based on the evaluation of an incomplete loss-mitigation application. Servicers may offer eligible loss-mitigation options to a borrower that has received a payment forbearance under the program that was made available to borrowers experiencing financial hardship due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 emergency, including one offered pursuant to section 4022 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Servicers may also offer eligible loss-mitigation options to a borrower that has had other principal and interest payments that are due and unpaid as a result of a financial hardship due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 emergency. This interim final rule becomes effective on July 01, 2020. Comments must be received on or before August 14, 2020.
Regulation X generally requires servicers to obtain a complete loss-mitigation application before evaluating a mortgage borrower for a loss-mitigation option, such as a loan modification or short sale. Regulation X provides an exception from this requirement for certain short-term loss mitigation options. Due to the particular needs of mortgage servicers and borrowers during the COVID-19 emergency, CFPB is amending Regulation X. The amendment conditions eligibility for the new exception on the loss-mitigation option satisfying three criteria:
- The loss-mitigation option must permit the borrower to delay paying certain amounts until the mortgage loan is refinanced, the mortgaged property is sold, the term of the mortgage loan ends, or, for a mortgage insured by Federal Housing Administration, the mortgage insurance terminates. These amounts include, without limitation, all payments forborne under a payment forbearance program made available to borrowers experiencing financial hardship due to the COVID-19 emergency, including one made pursuant to CARES Act. These amounts also include, without limitation all other principal and interest payments that are due and unpaid by a borrower experiencing financial hardship due to the COVID-19 emergency.
- Any amounts that the borrower may delay paying through the loss- mitigation option do not accrue interest; the servicer does not charge any fee in connection with the loss mitigation option; and the servicer waives all existing late charges, penalties, stop payment fees, or similar charges promptly upon the borrower's acceptance of the loss mitigation option.
- The borrower's acceptance of the loss-mitigation offer must resolve any prior delinquency. These criteria maintain important protections for borrowers and are intended to align with the COVID-19 payment deferral option announced by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and other similar programs.
The interim final rule also excludes servicers from certain regulatory requirements if a borrower accepts an option offered pursuant to the new exception. Specifically, the interim final rule provides that the servicer is not required to continue the reasonable diligence efforts Section 1024.41(b)(1) otherwise requires or send the acknowledgement notice Section 1024.41(b)(2) otherwise requires.
Comment Due Date: August 14, 2020
Effective Date: July 01, 2020
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, COVID-19, Real Estate, Regulation X, Credit Risk, CARES Act, Mortgage, CFPB
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleBIS Publishes Annual Report and Annual Economic Report for 2019-20
Next ArticleDFSA Withdraws License of Gefion Insurance
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced that the Green and Sustainable Finance (GSF) Cross-Agency Steering Group has launched the information and data repositories and outlined the progress made in advancing the development of green and sustainable finance in Hong Kong.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a report that explores the feasibility of integrating the G-Cubed general equilibrium model into the NGFS suite of models.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.