CFPB on Treatment of Certain COVID-19 Related Loss Mitigation Options
CFPB is issuing an interim final rule to amend the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) to temporarily permit mortgage servicers to offer certain loss-mitigation options based on the evaluation of an incomplete loss-mitigation application. Servicers may offer eligible loss-mitigation options to a borrower that has received a payment forbearance under the program that was made available to borrowers experiencing financial hardship due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 emergency, including one offered pursuant to section 4022 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Servicers may also offer eligible loss-mitigation options to a borrower that has had other principal and interest payments that are due and unpaid as a result of a financial hardship due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 emergency. This interim final rule becomes effective on July 01, 2020. Comments must be received on or before August 14, 2020.
Regulation X generally requires servicers to obtain a complete loss-mitigation application before evaluating a mortgage borrower for a loss-mitigation option, such as a loan modification or short sale. Regulation X provides an exception from this requirement for certain short-term loss mitigation options. Due to the particular needs of mortgage servicers and borrowers during the COVID-19 emergency, CFPB is amending Regulation X. The amendment conditions eligibility for the new exception on the loss-mitigation option satisfying three criteria:
- The loss-mitigation option must permit the borrower to delay paying certain amounts until the mortgage loan is refinanced, the mortgaged property is sold, the term of the mortgage loan ends, or, for a mortgage insured by Federal Housing Administration, the mortgage insurance terminates. These amounts include, without limitation, all payments forborne under a payment forbearance program made available to borrowers experiencing financial hardship due to the COVID-19 emergency, including one made pursuant to CARES Act. These amounts also include, without limitation all other principal and interest payments that are due and unpaid by a borrower experiencing financial hardship due to the COVID-19 emergency.
- Any amounts that the borrower may delay paying through the loss- mitigation option do not accrue interest; the servicer does not charge any fee in connection with the loss mitigation option; and the servicer waives all existing late charges, penalties, stop payment fees, or similar charges promptly upon the borrower's acceptance of the loss mitigation option.
- The borrower's acceptance of the loss-mitigation offer must resolve any prior delinquency. These criteria maintain important protections for borrowers and are intended to align with the COVID-19 payment deferral option announced by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and other similar programs.
The interim final rule also excludes servicers from certain regulatory requirements if a borrower accepts an option offered pursuant to the new exception. Specifically, the interim final rule provides that the servicer is not required to continue the reasonable diligence efforts Section 1024.41(b)(1) otherwise requires or send the acknowledgement notice Section 1024.41(b)(2) otherwise requires.
Related Links
Comment Due Date: August 14, 2020
Effective Date: July 01, 2020
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, COVID-19, Real Estate, Regulation X, Credit Risk, CARES Act, Mortgage, CFPB
Featured Experts
Victor Calanog, Ph.D.
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous Article
BIS Publishes Annual Report and Annual Economic Report for 2019-20Next Article
DFSA Withdraws License of Gefion InsuranceRelated Articles
HM Treasury Publishes Policy Statement Amending Benchmarks Regulation
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
PRA Consults on Implementation of Certain Provisions of CRD5 and CRR2
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies Finalize Rule to Reduce Impact of Large Bank Failures
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies Finalize Rule on Net Stable Funding Ratio Requirements
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.
FSB Sets Out Effective Practices for Cyber Incident Recovery
FSB finalized the toolkit of effective practices to assist financial institutions in their cyber incident response and recovery activities.
ECB Publishes Eleventh Issue of the Macroprudential Bulletin
ECB published eleventh issue of the Macroprudential Bulletin, which provides insight into the ongoing work of ECB in the field of macro-prudential policy.
HM Treasury Seeks Views on Review of Solvency II Regime for Insurers
HM Treasury issued a call for evidence seeking views to reform the prudential regulatory regime—also known as Solvency II—of the insurance sector in UK.
ESRB Responds to EC Consultation on Review of Solvency II
ESRB responded to the EC consultation on review of Solvency II regime.
HM Treasury Consults on Phase II of Future Regulatory Framework Review
HM Treasury launched a consultation on Phase II of the Future Regulatory Framework Review, with the comment period ending on January 19, 2021.
EC Publishes Work Program for 2021
EC adopted the work program for 2021.
