APRA published a frequently asked question (FAQ) for authorized deposit-taking institutions on the regulatory capital treatment of loans issued under the federal government’s Family Home Guarantee (FHG) and First Home Loan Deposit Scheme (FHLDS) programs. The clarifications provided in the FAQ are relevant mainly for the authorized deposit-taking institutions that use the standardized approach to credit risk. The FAQ also clarifies the correct reporting approach for entities that use the standardized approach to credit risk under the reporting standard ARS 112.1 on on-balance sheet assets under the standardized credit risk approach the reporting standard ARS 223.0 on residential mortgage lending.
Under the standardized approach to credit risk, loans subject to the FHG and FHLDS may be treated in a comparable manner to the residential mortgage loans with a loan-to-valuation ratio of 80% and accordingly risk-weighted at 35%. This risk-weight must be applied to the total amount lent to the borrower. This risk-weight reflects the government guarantee and terms of the program. Once the government guarantee ceases to apply, authorized deposit-taking institutions must revert to calculating the regulatory capital requirement in line with the existing requirements of the prudential standard APS 112 on standardized approach to credit risk. For authorized deposit-taking institutions that use the internal ratings-based approach to credit risk, there are no adjustments to the capital treatment of loans subject to the FHG or FHLDS.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Credit Risk, Residential Mortgage, FHG, FHLDS, Regulatory Capital, Standardized Approach, Internal Ratings Based Approach, APS 112, APS 223.0, APRA
Previous ArticlePRA and FPC Propose Changes to Leverage Ratio Framework in UK
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published version 5.1 of the filing rules for supervisory reporting.
The European Central Bank (ECB) Guideline 2021/1829 on the procedures for the collection of granular credit and credit risk data has been published in the Official Journal of European Union.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards on disclosure of investment policy by investment firms, under the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR).
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published the prudential practice guide CPG 511 to assist banks, insurers, and superannuation licensees in meeting requirements of CPS 511, the new prudential standard on remuneration.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) published a bulletin that provides an updated self-assessment tool for banks to evaluate their preparedness for cessation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that examines the progress made toward disclosures aligned with recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published the progress report on adoption of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) has implemented, in its information system, updates linked to the Data Point Model (DPM) version 3.1.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a thematic note that aims to identify and raise awareness of the transition risks of benchmark rates, as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and the Euro Overnight Index Average (EONIA) are close to being phased out.