OSFI Updates Guideline on Margin Requirements for Derivatives
OSFI updated the Guideline E-22, which establishes minimum standards for margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivative transactions undertaken by the federally regulated financial institutions. The updates relate to the amendments to legacy derivative contracts for addressing the interest rate benchmark reforms and to the documentation, custodial, and operational arrangements related to the exchange of initial margin between covered entities. The initial margin requirements will be phased-in to smaller counterparties by September 2020.
The guideline, which is based on the BCBS-IOSCO framework, was initially finalized in February 2016 and became effective in June 2017. Under the guideline, most covered federally regulated financial institutions that meet the definition of a covered entity have been subject to the mandatory exchange of variation margin from March 01, 2017. The guideline also requires the covered financial institutions to exchange initial margin. The exchange of initial margin began in September 2016 for the largest derivatives counterparties and is being gradually phased-in to smaller counterparties until September 2020. The updates to the guideline relate to the following:
- Amendments to legacy derivative contracts, pursued solely for addressing interest rate benchmark reforms, are deemed genuine amendments under footnote 17 of Guideline E-22. As such, these amendments would not require the application of the margin requirements for legacy derivative contracts under Guideline E-22.
- Documentation, custodial, and operational arrangements related to the exchange of initial margin between covered entities are not required to be entered into until the amount of initial margin to be exchanged approaches the CAD 75 million threshold, which is noted in Guideline E-22.
The updates are in support of the BCBS and IOSCO statement that was issued in March 2019. BCBS and IOSCO said that the amendments to legacy derivative contracts pursued solely for the purpose of addressing interest rate benchmark reforms do not require the application of the margin requirements for the purposes of the BCBS-IOSCO framework, although the position may be different under relevant implementing laws. BCBS and IOSCO also noted that the framework does not specify documentation, custodial, or operational requirements if the bilateral initial margin amount does not exceed the framework's EUR 50 million initial margin threshold. The guideline is applicable to banks, foreign bank branches, bank holding companies, trust and loan companies, life insurance companies, property and casualty insurance companies, and insurance holding companies.
Related Links
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Securities, Insurance, Margin Requirements, Guideline E-22, Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives, OTC Derivatives, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Initial Margin, OSFI
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Trevor Howes
IFRS 17 technical advisor; AXIS actuarial modeling system expert; extensive experience in life insurance and life reinsurance, with focus on modeling, valuation, and financial reporting
Previous Article
MAS to Issue Up To Five New Digital Bank Licenses in SingaporeRelated Articles
PRA Publishes Q&A on Property Valuation Requirements Under CRR
PRA published a set of questions and answers (Q&A) covering common queries regarding residential and commercial property valuations, for the purpose of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), during the period of disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA Publishes Guidelines on Loan Origination and Monitoring
EBA published guidelines on loan origination and monitoring, which bring together prudential standards and consumer protection obligations, along with the anti-money laundering and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations.
EBA Proposes Revised Standards for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities
EBA published a consultation paper on the draft amended regulatory technical standards on own funds and eligible liabilities.
EBA Sets Out Supervisory Convergence Plan for 2020
EBA published a report on convergence of supervisory practices in 2019.
IOSCO Consults on Outsourcing Principles for Operational Resilience
IOSCO proposed updates to its principles for regulated entities that outsource tasks to service providers.
MAS Consortium to Develop AI Fairness Metrics for Credit Scoring
MAS announced that the first phase of the Veritas initiative will commence with the development of fairness metrics in credit risk scoring and customer marketing.
BoE Updates Definitions for BTL Data Collection
BoE published the Statistical Notice 2020/4 to update the buy-to-let (BTL) Phase 2 and Phase 3 definitions for the Interest Rate Type data item.
FSI Examines Financial Stability Implications of Payment Deferrals
FSI published a brief note that examines challenges facing the banking sector as a result of the payment deferral programs put in place to support borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
RBNZ Publishes Financial Stability Report for May 2020
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
PRA Finalizes Policy on Prudent Person Principle Under Solvency II
PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.
