OSFI updated the Guideline E-22, which establishes minimum standards for margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivative transactions undertaken by the federally regulated financial institutions. The updates relate to the amendments to legacy derivative contracts for addressing the interest rate benchmark reforms and to the documentation, custodial, and operational arrangements related to the exchange of initial margin between covered entities. The initial margin requirements will be phased-in to smaller counterparties by September 2020.
The guideline, which is based on the BCBS-IOSCO framework, was initially finalized in February 2016 and became effective in June 2017. Under the guideline, most covered federally regulated financial institutions that meet the definition of a covered entity have been subject to the mandatory exchange of variation margin from March 01, 2017. The guideline also requires the covered financial institutions to exchange initial margin. The exchange of initial margin began in September 2016 for the largest derivatives counterparties and is being gradually phased-in to smaller counterparties until September 2020. The updates to the guideline relate to the following:
- Amendments to legacy derivative contracts, pursued solely for addressing interest rate benchmark reforms, are deemed genuine amendments under footnote 17 of Guideline E-22. As such, these amendments would not require the application of the margin requirements for legacy derivative contracts under Guideline E-22.
- Documentation, custodial, and operational arrangements related to the exchange of initial margin between covered entities are not required to be entered into until the amount of initial margin to be exchanged approaches the CAD 75 million threshold, which is noted in Guideline E-22.
The updates are in support of the BCBS and IOSCO statement that was issued in March 2019. BCBS and IOSCO said that the amendments to legacy derivative contracts pursued solely for the purpose of addressing interest rate benchmark reforms do not require the application of the margin requirements for the purposes of the BCBS-IOSCO framework, although the position may be different under relevant implementing laws. BCBS and IOSCO also noted that the framework does not specify documentation, custodial, or operational requirements if the bilateral initial margin amount does not exceed the framework's EUR 50 million initial margin threshold. The guideline is applicable to banks, foreign bank branches, bank holding companies, trust and loan companies, life insurance companies, property and casualty insurance companies, and insurance holding companies.
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Securities, Insurance, Margin Requirements, Guideline E-22, Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives, OTC Derivatives, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Initial Margin, OSFI
Previous ArticleMAS to Issue Up To Five New Digital Bank Licenses in Singapore
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.
EBA published an erratum for technical package on phase 1 of the reporting framework 3.0.
APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets.
ECB published a letter from Andrea Enria, the Chair of the Supervisory Board of ECB, answering questions raised by the President of the Bundestag (the German federal parliament) on how ECB assesses the financial stability of the euro area in the context of the significant level of nonperforming loans.