IMF published a paper that took stock of the fintech experience in different countries, conducted in-depth review of selected fintech topics, and identified key fintech issues that merit further attention of the membership and international bodies. The paper found that, despite the important regional and national differences, countries were broadly embracing the opportunities of fintech to boost economic growth and inclusion, while balancing risks to stability and integrity.
Last year, IMF and World Bank Group approved the Bali Fintech Agenda, which lays out key issues to consider in how technological innovation is changing the provision of financial services with implications for economic efficiency and growth, financial stability, inclusion, and integrity. In approving the Agenda, IMF Executive Directors asked staff to review fintech developments and consider their implications within the mandates of IMF and World Bank. This paper is in response to this call and draws on discussions with country authorities on issues raised in the context of IMF surveillance and World Bank country work, the findings of a survey of the membership on their approach to the Bali Fintech Agenda, and deeper exploration on selected fintech topics by staff. It identified key areas for international cooperation––including roles for IMF and World Bank Group––and the areas in which further work is needed at the national level and by relevant international organizations and standard-setting bodies.
The IMF Directors agreed that several key policy issues would require heightened attention from national authorities and international bodies. These include managing competing policy priorities with the aim of harnessing the benefits of fintech while supporting competition and strengthening financial stability, financial integrity, and consumer protection. Directors also emphasized the importance of other priorities, including building regulatory capacity, strengthening cyber-security, and enhancing data frameworks. They took note of staff’s analysis on the need to develop new international standards or good practices to support countries in adapting their legal and regulatory frameworks, although some Directors did not see the need for new standards related to fintech beyond what is already under discussion in the relevant international fora.
The IMF staff conducted an in-depth review of selected fintech topics, including regulatory sandboxes, aspects of crypto-assets, payments and settlement systems (large value and retail), data frameworks, selected legal issues, institutional arrangements, and the central bank digital currency. Based on the review. the paper concludes that development of international standards or good practices by standard-setting bodies is an urgent issue. This will help many countries adapt their legal and regulatory frameworks to the new entrants that are increasingly becoming part of the intermediation and financial service delivery chain. The paper highlights that cyber-security is another widely considered key risk facing financial systems and fintech applications. The rising capabilities of cyber-attacks is creating a sense of urgency among public authorities to institute effective measures for cyber-security risk management and operational resiliency.
Related Link: Report
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Fintech, Cyber Risk, Regtech, Crypto-Assets, Digital Currencies, Financial Stability, IMF
Previous ArticleHKMA Article Examines Public Money Recovery Arrangements Under FIRO
Next ArticleIAIS Publishes Newsletter for September 2019
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) proposed to amend the supervisory statement on supervision of run-off undertakings that are subject to Solvency II regulation.
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.