HMT Publishes Review of AML/CFT Regulatory Regime
Her Majesty's Treasury (HMT) published a forward-looking review of the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime in UK, along with the post-implementation reviews on the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (MLRs) and the Office for Professional Body AML Supervision Regulations (OPBAS), to fulfil its statutory obligations.
The forward-looking review of the AML/CFT regime focused on improving the effectiveness of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLRs), ensuring the application of effective risk-based controls across the regulated sector and developing a world-class AML supervisory regime. The review has been structured around three key themes:
- Systemic Effectiveness. Ensuring that as the government works to reform and improve the UK’s regime, there is an agreed definition of what effectiveness looks like and some proposals on how we can start to measure this with more precision
- Regulatory Effectiveness. Ensuring that the firms and individuals on the front line of the UK’s fight against illicit finance are well-equipped, with a strong risk understanding and capability to implement effective risk-based controls within their business as well as the scope to target that activity at areas of highest risk
- Supervisory Effectiveness. Continuing reform of the supervision regime and building on the improvements made in recent years while assessing the rationale for further structural change to the regime
The post-implementation review of the MLRs draws on the methodology of "Immediate Outcomes" established by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which is the international standard-setter for AML. The review assessed the extent to which the MLRs had been successful in meeting their stated policy intent, which was to transpose 4MLD and 5MLD (Anti Money Laundering Directive), making the UK economy a hostile environment for illicit finance while minimizing unnecessary burdens on legitimate businesses. The post-implementation review of the OPBAS regulations considered the implementation and effectiveness of the regulations and the activity they require of supervisors. The review measured the progress of OPBAS and effectiveness of the OPBAS regulations. The report focusses on the areas that the government considers are the most important for improving effectiveness. This includes large overarching areas (such as the risk-based approach and the objectives of the MLRs) and much more specific areas (such as the gatekeeping test or guidance drafting process). The key areas of the government focus for the next phase of the development of the MLRs are as follows:
- Supervision. The government is clear that reform is needed, but the best scale and type of reform to improve effectiveness and solve the problems that have been identified is not yet clear. The government has laid out a shortlist and will consult further on options for reform.
- Specific regulations. The government is confident that most of the requirements and provisions currently in the MLRs are the right ones. The government is committed to continuing to align with and champion the FATF’s recommendations.
- Objectives. The government will set out clear new objectives to the MLRs, in line with the FATF’s methodology and embedding a renewed definition of effectiveness.
- Risks. The government will use existing processes including the NRA to consider emerging ML/TF risks and consider sectors for addition to the MLRs. The government will not set out National Priorities at this time but will instead focus on a system-wide effort to improve risk understanding and information sharing around risks and threats.
- Wider levers for effectiveness. The government continues to engage with stakeholders to deepen understanding of the application of new technologies, the challenges faced by small or newly regulated firms, the incentives of the current system, and the supervisory approach to the risk-based approach.
- Guidance. The government will not overhaul the current guidance arrangements but will seek to make the existing guidance more streamlined, consistent, and clear; it will consider requests for further guidance on a case-by-case basis.
Related Links
- Press Release
- Review of AML/CFT Regime (PDF)
- Post Implementation Review of MLR (PDF)
- Post Implementation Review of OPBAS Regulations (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, AML CFT, Money Laundering, OPBAS, MLR, Systemic Risk, FATF, ML TF Risk, AMLD, Regtech, Operational Risk, Basel, HM Treasury
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Blake Coules
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Previous Article
MAS Revises Notices Related to Liquidity Risk and Covered BondsRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.