FCA Seeks Views on New Prudential Regime for UK Investment Firms
FCA published a discussion paper on the prudential regime for investment firms in UK. The discussion paper sets out the technical details of, and initial views of FCA on, the Investment Firm Directive (IFD) and the Investment Firm Regulation (IFR). In December 2019, the Official Journal of the European Union published IFD and IFR, with which the investment firms and competent authorities in EU member states will be required to comply from June 2021. As UK has exited the EU, FCA will not implement the IFD and IFR. The government will instead introduce a framework for a new prudential regime for investment firms in UK. FCA is seeking views on how best to implement this new regime. The comment period for this discussion paper ends on September 25, 2020. FCA will consider the feedback and publish a consultation paper later in 2020.
The discussion paper is relevant for all solo-regulated investment firms that are authorized under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID). It will also be of interest to Collective Portfolio Management Investment Firms and to investment firms authorized by PRA. The approach that has been followed in the discussion paper is to set out, coherently and logically, the requirements the IFD/IFR places on EU firms and competent authorities. Where relevant, FCA has also set out in each chapter its initial views on the intention and implication of the regime and interpretation of it. This is particularly the case where the regime makes a material change to the status quo, or where the EU text provides for national discretions, or has ambiguities.
The IFD and IFR represent a significant change to how MiFID investment firms will be prudentially regulated. Investment firms should be aware of the scale of the change the IFD and IFR represent. In addition to various less material changes compared to the existing regime, major changes described in the discussion paper include:
- An update to the initial capital required for authorization
- Changes to the rules on the definition of capital
- New own funds requirements, including the introduction of the K-factor approach
- New rules on prudential consolidation, group risk, and concentration risk
- Applying liquidity requirements to all investment firms
- A new approach for investment firms' internal risk and prudential assessments and the supervision of those requirements
- New requirements on remuneration policies
- Changes to reporting and disclosure requirements
Related Links
Comment Due Date: September 25, 2020
Keywords: Europe, UK, Securities, IFR, IFD, MIFID, Regulatory Capital, Investment Firms, Reporting, Disclosures, ESG, FCA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Pierre-Etienne Chabanel
Brings expertise in technology and software solutions around banking regulation, whether deployed on-premises or in the cloud.
Related Articles
EIOPA Report Analyzes Use and Impact of Long-Term Guarantee Measures
EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.
BIS, SNB, and SIX Announce Successful Completion of CBDC POC
The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.
EBA Sets Out Treatment of Certain Banking Book Positions Under FRTB
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.
EIOPA Consults on Integrating Climate Change into SII Standard Formula
EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.
EU Issues Corrigenda to Investment Firms Directive and Regulation
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.
MAS Proposes Changes to Rules Arising from Banking Amendment Act
MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.
PRA to Elaborate on Approach to Transposition of CRD5 by Mid-December
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
RBNZ Consults on Aspects of Insurance Act, Solvency Standards & IFRS17
RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.
SRB Sets Out Work Program for 2021-2023
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA Consults on KPIs on Sustainability for Non-Financial Reporting
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.
