IMF published a staff report that presents country experiences (in the form of case studies) with reforms to strengthen regulatory oversight of the Islamic banking sector. The report reviews experiences with, and the progress made, in adapting prudential, safety nets and resolution frameworks to the specifics of Islamic banking. The countries, for which detailed case studies have been undertaken, are Bahrain, Djibouti, Indonesia, Kenya, Kuwait, Malaysia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Sudan, Turkey, and the United Kingdom.
This background paper is a supplement to the board paper on “Ensuring Financial Stability in Countries with Islamic Banking (IB) Sectors.” This assessment is expected to help identify common challenges that these countries face in reforming their regulatory frameworks and to distill best practices. The case studies broadly analyze the following information:
The scale, structure, and growth of the Islamic finance industry, to give an indication of the significance of the Islamic banking sector in the financial industries of the various countries
The corporate and balance sheet structures of the Islamic banks, to help identify financial stability risks that the Islamic banks are exposed to, including both standard banking risks and risks that are unique to the sector
The regulatory, governance, and supervisory frameworks as well as the supporting financial infrastructure for liquidity management, effective resolution, and deposit insurance, to provide insights on the extent to which countries have adapted their frameworks to the specifics of Islamic finance, to address the identified stability risks
Policy options and lessons for reform
The case studies highlight important, but uneven, progress in adapting the legal, regulatory, and supervisory frameworks to the specificities of Islamic banking. Shari’ah governance frameworks have been established in most countries and there has been an increase in the number of countries adopting centralized Shari’ah boards, albeit from a low base. Meanwhile, progress in adapting the prudential, consumer protection, liquidity management, safety nets, and resolution frameworks remains uneven across countries. Bahrain and Malaysia have made the most advances in systematically adapting their policy frameworks to Islamic finance, in line with standards issued by the Islamic Financial Services Board and the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions.
Related Link: Staff Report (PDF)
Keywords: International, IMF, Banking, Islamic Banking, Shari'ah, Financial Stability, Regulatory Reforms
PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
EIOPA published the financial stability report that provides detailed quantitative and qualitative assessment of the key risks identified for the insurance and occupational pensions sectors in the European Economic Area.
EBA published its risk dashboard for the first quarter of 2020 together with the results of the risk assessment questionnaire.
EBA announced that the next stress testing exercise is expected to be launched at the end of January 2021 and its results are to be published at the end of July 2021.
PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II.
MAS published a statement guidance on dividend distribution by banks.
APRA updated its capital management guidance for banks, particularly easing restrictions around paying dividends as institutions continue to manage the disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany.
EBA issued a statement reminding financial institutions that the transition period between EU and UK will expire on December 31, 2020; this will end the possibility for the UK-based financial institutions to offer financial services to EU customers on a cross-border basis via passporting.
SRB published guidance on operational continuity in resolution and financial market infrastructure (FMI) contingency plans.