The NGFS Study Group on Biodiversity and Financial Stability published a Vision paper exploring the case for action in addressing the financial stability concerns arising from biodiversity loss. The report notes that central banks and prudential supervisory authorities are increasingly recognizing the potential for biodiversity loss to threaten macroeconomic stability as well as the stability of the financial systems that they oversee. However, the complexity of the issue, the lack of regulations and policy guidance, and the limited tools to measure, disclose, and manage nature-related financial risks create a range of challenges to overcome.
The paper sets out links between the biodiversity loss and the macroeconomic and financial systems, also considering the impact of the financial sector in exacerbating the degradation of natural systems. It then poses a series of questions regarding whether and how central bankers and supervisors should, in the context of pursuing their mandates, address the issue of biodiversity loss. The paper points out that, given the scale of both the challenge of biodiversity loss and the knowledge gaps around it, a strategic and structured approach by central banks and financial supervisors is needed. The Study Group plans to explore the potential role of central banks and supervisors across a range of functions, including the following:
- Looking at the role of financial authorities in assessing the relationship between biodiversity and financial stability and exploring whether the traditional methods adequate (such as stress testing) are adequate
- Identifying what key biodiversity indicators should central banks and supervisors be monitoring, evaluating and reporting on and what disclosure they should require from regulated entities
- From the micro-prudential perspective, reviewing whether and how biodiversity factors can be included in routine activities to assess the safety and soundness of financial firms and what role might scenario-based tools play in analyzing and stress-testing biodiversity risk exposures
- Investigating the incorporation of biodiversity risks into macro-prudential policy frameworks and instruments
- Reviewing whether and how central banks and supervisors should support the scaling up of innovative financial tools to help support biodiversity and strengthen financial stability
The Study Group would welcome feedback on the initial approach set out in this Vision document and would welcome suggestions or examples of research and analysis that can help to deepen its thinking. Based on this as well as its own research, the Study Group will publish an interim report ahead of COP15 Convention on Biological Diversity in October 2021 and this report will be open for further feedback. The Convention is expected to agree on a post-2020 global biodiversity framework, which aims to halt and reverse biodiversity loss. The study group will publish its final report in February 2022, along the the research agenda for the following years.
Keywords: International, Banking, Climate Change Risk, ESG, COP 15, NGFS, Biodiversity Loss, Financial Stability, Stress Testing, Macro-Prudential Policy, Micro-Prudential Policy, NGFS
Previous ArticleHKMA Requires Banks to Submit Plans for Fintech Adoption
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published the strategic plan for 2022-2025 and the departmental plan for 2022-23.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is consulting, until August 31, 2022, on the draft implementing technical standards specifying requirements for the information that sellers of non-performing loans (NPLs) shall provide to prospective buyers.
The European Council and the Parliament reached an agreement on the revised Directive on security of network and information systems (NIS2 Directive).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying information that crowdfunding service providers shall provide to investors on the calculation of credit scores and prices of crowdfunding offers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published a paper that examines the systemic risk posed by increasing use of cloud services, along with the potential policy options to mitigate this risk.
The European Commission (EC) published a public consultation on the review of revised payment services directive (PSD2) and open finance.
The European Commission (EC) has issued two letters mandating the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) to jointly propose amendments to the regulatory technical standards under Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation or SFDR.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on convergence of supervisory practices for 2021. Additionally, following a request from the European Commission (EC),
The Swiss National Bank (SNB) published Version 1.2 of the reporting forms (NSFR_G and NSFR_P) on the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) of banks, along with the associated documentation.
The Farm Credit Administration published, in the Federal Register, the final rule on implementation of the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) methodology for allowances