ESMA Issues Response to IASB Draft on Interest Rate Benchmark Reform
ESMA published a letter to IASB as a response to the IASB exposure draft on interest rate benchmark reform. ESMA supports the IASB initiative to provide, in a staged approach, a timely response to the increasing level of uncertainty about the possible financial reporting impact of the long-term viability of some interest rate benchmarks. Additionally, ESMA issued a letter to European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on the draft comment letter of EFRAG on the IASB exposure draft on interest rate benchmark reform. Appendices to the letters set out detailed comments on the exposure draft of IASB.
The response letter to IASB highlights the following key points:
- ESMA agrees with the proposals set out in the exposure draft to amend old and new standards on financial instruments, namely IAS 39 and IFRS 9. The proposals address the issues that affect the application of hedge accounting requirements in the period before the replacement of an existing interest rate benchmark with an alternative interest rate, by setting out well-specified exceptions to the relevant requirements in IFRS 9 and IAS 39.
- ESMA recommends that IASB should consider providing clarifications about limitations on the application of the proposed exceptions, which are included in the basis for conclusions of the exposure draft, as amendments to the accompanying authoritative guidance of both IFRS 9 and IAS 39. This would promote consistent application and facilitate both implementation and enforceability of the proposed changes.
- ESMA urges IASB to proceed rapidly toward finalization of the proposed amendments, so that they can be applicable for the preparation of the 2019 annual financial statements.
- ESMA concurs with IASB that there are other issues that might affect financial reporting when an existing interest rate benchmark is replaced with an alternative benchmark as part of a second phase. ESMA highlighted that addressing these "post-replacement" accounting issues is urgent and, therefore, encourages IASB to address these aspects as soon as possible.
In the view of ESMA, the next phase of the proposed changes should consider and address issues that relate, among others, to the application of the guidance on de-recognition and modification of financial instruments, the implications for the determination of fair value, and the implications on hedge accounting of changes in the contractual terms and in the contractual documentation.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Europe, Accounting, Banking, IFRS 9, IAS 39, Financial Instruments, Hedge Accounting, IBOR, Interest Rate Benchmark, IASB, ESMA
Featured Experts
Metin Epözdemir
Metin Epözdemir helps European and African banks with design and implementation of credit risk, stress testing, capital management, and credit loss accounting solutions.
Masha Muzyka
CECL, IFRS 9, and IFRS 17 expert; credit risk and insurance risk specialist; strategic planning and credit analytics solutions consultant
Anna Krayn
CECL adoption expert; engagement manager for loss estimation, internal risk capability enhancement, and counterparty credit risk management
Previous Article
EC Amends Regulation Supplementing Solvency II DirectiveRelated Articles
BIS Innovation Hub Sets Out Work Program for 2021
BIS Innovation Hub published the work program for 2021, with focus on suptech and regtech, next-generation financial market infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, open finance, green finance, and cyber security.
EC Plans to Consult on Crisis Management and EDIS Framework Revisions
In an article published by SRB, Mairead McGuinness, the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability, and Capital Markets Union, discussed the progress and next steps toward completion of the Banking Union.
EBA Finalizes Remuneration Standards for Investment Firms in EU
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
ECA Recommends Actions to Enhance Resolution Planning for Banks
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE Publishes Key Elements of the 2021 Stress Testing for Banks in UK
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA Proposes Rules on Identity Verification of Depositor Protection
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB Publishes Work Program for 2021
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA Issues Update on Move to New Data Collection Platform
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank Publishes Derivation Rules for Reporting by Banks
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED Revises Capital Planning and Stress Testing Requirements for Banks
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
