ESMA Issues Response to IASB Draft on Interest Rate Benchmark Reform
ESMA published a letter to IASB as a response to the IASB exposure draft on interest rate benchmark reform. ESMA supports the IASB initiative to provide, in a staged approach, a timely response to the increasing level of uncertainty about the possible financial reporting impact of the long-term viability of some interest rate benchmarks. Additionally, ESMA issued a letter to European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on the draft comment letter of EFRAG on the IASB exposure draft on interest rate benchmark reform. Appendices to the letters set out detailed comments on the exposure draft of IASB.
The response letter to IASB highlights the following key points:
- ESMA agrees with the proposals set out in the exposure draft to amend old and new standards on financial instruments, namely IAS 39 and IFRS 9. The proposals address the issues that affect the application of hedge accounting requirements in the period before the replacement of an existing interest rate benchmark with an alternative interest rate, by setting out well-specified exceptions to the relevant requirements in IFRS 9 and IAS 39.
- ESMA recommends that IASB should consider providing clarifications about limitations on the application of the proposed exceptions, which are included in the basis for conclusions of the exposure draft, as amendments to the accompanying authoritative guidance of both IFRS 9 and IAS 39. This would promote consistent application and facilitate both implementation and enforceability of the proposed changes.
- ESMA urges IASB to proceed rapidly toward finalization of the proposed amendments, so that they can be applicable for the preparation of the 2019 annual financial statements.
- ESMA concurs with IASB that there are other issues that might affect financial reporting when an existing interest rate benchmark is replaced with an alternative benchmark as part of a second phase. ESMA highlighted that addressing these "post-replacement" accounting issues is urgent and, therefore, encourages IASB to address these aspects as soon as possible.
In the view of ESMA, the next phase of the proposed changes should consider and address issues that relate, among others, to the application of the guidance on de-recognition and modification of financial instruments, the implications for the determination of fair value, and the implications on hedge accounting of changes in the contractual terms and in the contractual documentation.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Europe, Accounting, Banking, IFRS 9, IAS 39, Financial Instruments, Hedge Accounting, IBOR, Interest Rate Benchmark, IASB, ESMA
Previous Article
Swiss Federal Council Consults on Improving Framework for BlockchainRelated Articles
|
News
US Agencies Consult on Capital Treatment of Land Development LoansUS Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) issued a proposed rule on the treatment of loans that finance the development of land for purposes of the one- to four-family residential properties exclusion in the definition of high volatility commercial real estate (HVCRE) exposure in the regulatory capital rule.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for July 2019Under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week, EBA published answers to five questions related to supervisory reporting.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ESMA Updates Manual for European Single Electronic Format in EUESMA updated the reporting manual for European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FED Updates Supplemental Instructions for Reporting Form FR Y-9CFED updated the supplemental instructions for FR Y-9C reporting.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Publishes Report on Monitoring Implementation of LCR in EUEBA published its first report on the monitoring of the implementation of liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) in EU.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
APRA Applies Additional Capital Requirements to Three Australian BanksAPRA is applying additional capital requirements to three major banks in Australia to reflect higher operational risk identified in their risk governance self-assessments.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
IMF Report on 2019 Article IV Consultation on Euro Area PoliciesIMF published its staff report in context of the 2019 Article IV consultation on euro area policies with member countries.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FSB to Survey Practices on Cyber Incident Response and RecoveryFSB launched a survey on the industry practices on cyber incident response and recovery.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ECB Appoints New Members of Supervisory BoardThe Governing Council of ECB appointed Edouard Fernandez-Bollo, Kerstin af Jochnick, and Elizabeth McCaul as representatives to the Supervisory Board of ECB Banking Supervision, for a five-year non-renewable term.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
OSFI Consults on Applying Proportionality to Pillar 1 Rules in CanadaOSFI published a discussion paper seeks input on possible tailoring of the capital and liquidity requirements for small and medium-size deposit-taking institutions.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
