RBI has proposed changes in regulations applicable to the Housing Finance Companies or HFCs. The proposal was open for public comments until July 15, 2020. RBI reviewed the extant regulatory framework applicable to Housing Finance Companies, with a view to regulating the Housing Finance Companies as a category of the Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs). For areas in which the extant Housing Finance Company regulation differs from that of the NBFCs, the changes will be introduced in the least disruptive manner. The key proposed changes relate to the classification of Housing Finance Companies as systemically important, the harmonization of definitions of capital with that of the NBFCs, the liquidity risk framework, the securitization framework, the information technology framework, and the implementation of Indian Accounting Standards.
The regulation of Housing Finance Companies was transferred from the National Housing Bank to RBI, with effect from August 09, 2019. After this transfer, it was decided that RBI will review the extant regulatory framework applicable to the Housing Finance Companies and issue the revised regulations in due course. Until the revised guidelines are issued, the Housing Finance Companies shall continue to comply with the directions and instructions issued by the National Housing Bank. Harmonization of the extant regulations of the Housing Finance Companies will be done in phases, over a period of two to three years. The major changes envisaged in the regulatory framework for Housing Finance Companies, include the following:
- Defining principal business and qualifying assets for the Housing Finance Companies
- Defining the phrase "providing finance for housing" or "housing finance"
- Classifying Housing Finance Companies as systemically important (asset size of INR 5 billion and above) and non-systemically important (asset size of less than INR 5 billion)
- Harmonizing definitions of capital (Tier I and Tier II) with that of the NBFCs
- Applying directions on liquidity risk framework and securitization for the NBFCs, to the Housing Finance Companies
- Extending instructions issued to the NBFCs on implementation of Indian Accounting Standards, to the Housing Finance Companies (Prudential floor for expected credit loss will be based on the extant instructions on provisioning applicable to the Housing Finance Companies.)
Additionally, the key differences between the extant regulations of the Housing Finance Companies versus the regulations for the NBFCs are as follows:
- Capital requirements (Capital to Risk-weighted Assets Ratio, or CRAR, and risk-weights)—The minimum CRAR prescribed for the Housing Finance Companies is, at present, 12% and will be progressively increased to 14% by March 31, 2021 and to 15% by March 31, 2022. The risk-weights for assets of the Housing Finance Companies are in the range of 30% to 125%, based on factors such as asset classification, loan-to-value, and type of borrower. However, for the NBFCs, the minimum CRAR is 15% and risk-weights are broadly under the 0%, 20%, and 100% categories.
- Limits on exposure to commercial real estate and capital markets—The limits prescribed for the Housing Finance Companies shall not be more than 20% of capital fund for exposure to commercial real estate by way of investment in land and building and this limit shall not be more than 40% of net worth total exposure (of which direct exposure should be 20% of net worth) for capital markets exposure. However, no limits have been prescribed for the NBFCs.
Comment Due Date: July 15, 2020
Keywords: Asia Pacific, India, Banking, HFC, NBFC, Basel, Regulatory Capital, Housing Finance Companies, CRE, RRE, Credit Risk, Systemic Risk, RBI
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.