OSFI Proposes Revisions to Guideline on Sound Reinsurance Practices
OSFI proposed the draft guideline B-3 that sets out OSFI expectations on sound reinsurance practices and procedures. OSFI requests comments on the proposal by August 16, 2019 and intends to release the final guideline in 2020. The final guideline will be effective on the date of its issuance in 2020. OSFI also issued an impact analysis statement on the guideline.
OSFI, in June 2018, had issued a discussion paper on a reinsurance framework and the paper included proposals to enhance and clarify the OSFI expectations for prudent reinsurance practices. The Annex to the letter proposing the draft guideline summarizes comments received regarding the June 2018 proposals, along with the responses of OSFI. The revisions to the guideline reflect these proposals as well as comments received in response to the discussion paper. Key changes to the guideline encourage insurers to better identify and manage risks arising from the use of reinsurance, particularly counterparty risk. Revisions also clarify the OSFI expectation that reinsurance payments flow directly to a cedant insurer in Canada and reaffirm OSFI's principles-based expectation that an insurer not cede substantially all of its risks. These changes are primarily clarifications, but may highlight the need for some insurers to adjust aspects of their reinsurance programs.
Guideline B-3 applies to all federally regulated insurers that are party to reinsurance cessions, retrocessions and, where applicable, to assumption reinsurance transactions. This guideline is complementary to, and should be read in conjunction with other OSFI guidance, including Guideline A on life insurance capital adequacy test, guideline on corporate governance, and Guideline E-17 on background checks on directors and senior management.
OSFI noted some that federally regulated insurers are making greater use of reinsurance and have larger and more concentrated exposures to reinsurers. In addition, the federally regulated insurers are not consistently interpreting and applying some of the OSFI expectations for prudent reinsurance risk management. Consequently, some federally regulated insurers may have more risk associated with their reinsurance programs than appropriate. Hence, the objective of the OSFI reinsurance review is to ensure that the regulatory framework for reinsurance remains effective and appropriate.
Related Links
Comment Due Date: August 16, 2019
Effective Date: 2020 (expected)
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Insurance, Reinsurance, Guideline B-3, Counterparty Risk, Reinsurance Practices, OSFI
Previous Article
APRA Finalizes Schedule on Scope of Variable Remuneration Under BEARRelated Articles
EBA Publishes Guidelines on Loan Origination and Monitoring
EBA published guidelines on loan origination and monitoring, which bring together prudential standards and consumer protection obligations, along with the anti-money laundering and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations.
EBA Proposes Revised Standards for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities
EBA published a consultation paper on the draft amended regulatory technical standards on own funds and eligible liabilities.
EBA Sets Out Supervisory Convergence Plan for 2020
EBA published a report on convergence of supervisory practices in 2019.
PRA Publishes Q&A on Property Valuation Requirements Under CRR
PRA published a set of questions and answers (Q&A) covering common queries regarding residential and commercial property valuations, for the purpose of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), during the period of disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
IOSCO Consults on Outsourcing Principles for Operational Resilience
IOSCO proposed updates to its principles for regulated entities that outsource tasks to service providers.
MAS Consortium to Develop AI Fairness Metrics for Credit Scoring
MAS announced that the first phase of the Veritas initiative will commence with the development of fairness metrics in credit risk scoring and customer marketing.
BoE Updates Definitions for BTL Data Collection
BoE published the Statistical Notice 2020/4 to update the buy-to-let (BTL) Phase 2 and Phase 3 definitions for the Interest Rate Type data item.
FSI Examines Financial Stability Implications of Payment Deferrals
FSI published a brief note that examines challenges facing the banking sector as a result of the payment deferral programs put in place to support borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
PRA Finalizes Policy on Prudent Person Principle Under Solvency II
PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.
EBA on Extending Large Exposure Limits for French Systemic Banks
EBA published an opinion following the notification by the French macro-prudential authority, the Haut Conseil de Stabilité Financière (HCSF), of its intention to extend a measure introduced in 2018 on the use of Article 458(9) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
