OSFI Proposes Revisions to Guideline on Sound Reinsurance Practices
OSFI proposed the draft guideline B-3 that sets out OSFI expectations on sound reinsurance practices and procedures. OSFI requests comments on the proposal by August 16, 2019 and intends to release the final guideline in 2020. The final guideline will be effective on the date of its issuance in 2020. OSFI also issued an impact analysis statement on the guideline.
OSFI, in June 2018, had issued a discussion paper on a reinsurance framework and the paper included proposals to enhance and clarify the OSFI expectations for prudent reinsurance practices. The Annex to the letter proposing the draft guideline summarizes comments received regarding the June 2018 proposals, along with the responses of OSFI. The revisions to the guideline reflect these proposals as well as comments received in response to the discussion paper. Key changes to the guideline encourage insurers to better identify and manage risks arising from the use of reinsurance, particularly counterparty risk. Revisions also clarify the OSFI expectation that reinsurance payments flow directly to a cedant insurer in Canada and reaffirm OSFI's principles-based expectation that an insurer not cede substantially all of its risks. These changes are primarily clarifications, but may highlight the need for some insurers to adjust aspects of their reinsurance programs.
Guideline B-3 applies to all federally regulated insurers that are party to reinsurance cessions, retrocessions and, where applicable, to assumption reinsurance transactions. This guideline is complementary to, and should be read in conjunction with other OSFI guidance, including Guideline A on life insurance capital adequacy test, guideline on corporate governance, and Guideline E-17 on background checks on directors and senior management.
OSFI noted some that federally regulated insurers are making greater use of reinsurance and have larger and more concentrated exposures to reinsurers. In addition, the federally regulated insurers are not consistently interpreting and applying some of the OSFI expectations for prudent reinsurance risk management. Consequently, some federally regulated insurers may have more risk associated with their reinsurance programs than appropriate. Hence, the objective of the OSFI reinsurance review is to ensure that the regulatory framework for reinsurance remains effective and appropriate.
Related Links
Comment Due Date: August 16, 2019
Effective Date: 2020 (expected)
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Insurance, Reinsurance, Guideline B-3, Counterparty Risk, Reinsurance Practices, OSFI
Previous Article
HKMA Concludes Consultation on Loss Absorbing Capacity RequirementsRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
