RBI published a discussion paper on governance in commercial banks in India. The objective of the discussion paper is to align the current regulatory framework with global best practices while being mindful of the context of domestic financial system. The comments on the discussion paper will be accepted until July 15, 2020. Based on the feedback, RBI will issue necessary directions or guidelines and provide clarifications, if needed, in respect of any matter covered in the directions or guidelines. The new guidelines or direction shall come into effect within a period of six months after publication or April 01, 2021, whichever is later.
Improving the quality of governance in financial intermediaries is an important determinant of efficiency in allocation of resources, protection of depositors’ interest, and maintaining financial stability. In this endeavor, the paper has been drafted to encourage stakeholder feedback. The guidelines or directions that are the subject of this discussion paper are intended to:
- Empower the board of directors to set the culture and values of the organization; recognize and manage conflicts of interest; set the appetite for risk and manage risks within the appetite; and improve the supervisory oversight of senior management
- Empower the assurance functions through various interventions
- Achieve clear division of responsibilities between the Board and the management
- Encourage the separation of ownership from management
The content in the paper have been compiled after reviewing extant instructions/guidelines/directions of RBI and relevant guidance available in public domain, including those issued by BCBS, FSB, and the Banks Board Bureau. The unique characteristic of financial intermediation and spill-over impact of governance failures on real sector has not been missed while drafting the paper. Therefore, the approach has been to set higher aspirational standards in governance for entities engaged in financial intermediation. The paper must be read along with other governing statutes, regulations, and licensing conditions applicable to banks and the most stringent shall be followed. The discussion paper is applicable to private sector banks, including small finance banks, payments banks, wholly-owned subsidiaries of foreign banks and foreign banks operating in India under branch model. It is also applicable to the State Bank of India, nationalized banks and regional rural banks, except in so far as what is prescribed is not inconsistent with provisions of specific statutes applicable to them or in case where the major shareholder or promoter—that is, the government of India—retains its instructions.
Comment Due Date: July 15, 2020
Keywords: Asia Pacific, India, Banking, Governance, Risk Appetite, Operational Risk, Internal Control, Guidelines, Basel, RBI
Previous ArticleFSC of Korea Releases Financial Policy Plans for Second Half of 2020
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.