EIOPA published a discussion paper on the insurance and reinsurance value chain and new business models arising from digitalization. EIOPA is aiming to get a better picture on possible fragmentation of the EU insurance value chain and supervisory challenges related to that. This paper is a first step in scrutinizing the situation to support supervisors in the challenges arising from the new business models and the possible fragmentation of the insurance value chain, as a result of new technologies, business models, and actors entering the insurance market. The discussion paper contains 21 questions to consider when responding to the request for feedback. EIOPA will assess the feedback to this discussion paper to better understand the phenomenon and plan useful next steps. Feedback on this discussion paper can be submitted, via the EU Survey Tool, by September 07, 2020.
Complexity of how insurance is being manufactured and distributed is increasing, in addition to the growing involvement of third parties, with new forms of outsourcing. However, this can come with additional challenges in the form of legal and compliance issues as well as the creation of new conduct and prudential risks and amplification or relocation of significantly old risks such as operational risk, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) risks, security, governance, and reputational risks. The widespread use of third party providers can also lead to concentration risk if a large number of undertakings become dependent on a small number of dominant outsourced or third party service providers. Thus, a fragmentation of the insurance value chain could occur, including a potential for a reduced regulatory and supervisory grip on the relevant activities in the value chain, or ways in which the lengthening of the value chain stresses existing regulatory and supervisory oversight.
As a consequence, supervision requires more attention to different companies involved throughout the value chain that must be supervised, or at least identified and overseen efficiently and effectively. Supervisors are also challenged to improve their information gathering, knowledge, experience, skillset, and resources for controlling new models and technologies while keeping up with the rapid changes. The consultation also highlights that Solvency II regular reporting might not be fit-for-purpose to have an overview of cooperation with all third parties and there might be a need for more flexible reporting. Similarly, although Solvency II Directive provides rules for outsourcing, it might be worth exploring additional practices for proper supervision of more fragmented value chains. Effort is also needed to avoid diverging supervisory outcomes between national competent authorities, particularly considering that the insurtech developments can often have a cross-border and cross-sector impact. As per EIOPA, the possible areas for further work include the following:
- More specific analysis of possible regulatory responses to third parties in the value chain. This could include exploring ways of getting better overview on market developments involving third parties active in the insurance value chain, including understanding ownership structures, partnership agreements, and new forms of outsourcing to assess who underwrites the risk and where risks are concentrated.
- A follow-up study focusing on the impact of platforms and ecosystems and their practical supervision (licensing, outsourcing, consumer protection, product oversight, and governance rules), including the application of EU law and possible gaps.
- Adapting disclosures and advice requirements to the digital world, based on an assessment of customer capabilities and new behavior patterns and ways of providing information and advice.
- Further analyses of broader measures that might underpin sound digital markets in insurance and insurance related data.
EIOPA is expecting, from interested parties, views on whether they agree with its view of the risks and benefits and whether they have any comments or additional proposals on proposed solutions or next steps. EIOPA will work further with the national competent authorities on supervisory responses to further support supervisors and supervisory convergence, while maintaining a strong and open dialog with the market and other stakeholders.
Comment Due Date: September 07, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Reinsurance, Operational Risk, Governance, Cyber Risk, Concentration Risk, Insurtech, Cloud Computing, Solvency II, Reporting, EIOPA
Previous ArticleECB Report Examines Quality of Lending Practices of Banks
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.