EIOPA published a discussion paper on the insurance and reinsurance value chain and new business models arising from digitalization. EIOPA is aiming to get a better picture on possible fragmentation of the EU insurance value chain and supervisory challenges related to that. This paper is a first step in scrutinizing the situation to support supervisors in the challenges arising from the new business models and the possible fragmentation of the insurance value chain, as a result of new technologies, business models, and actors entering the insurance market. The discussion paper contains 21 questions to consider when responding to the request for feedback. EIOPA will assess the feedback to this discussion paper to better understand the phenomenon and plan useful next steps. Feedback on this discussion paper can be submitted, via the EU Survey Tool, by September 07, 2020.
Complexity of how insurance is being manufactured and distributed is increasing, in addition to the growing involvement of third parties, with new forms of outsourcing. However, this can come with additional challenges in the form of legal and compliance issues as well as the creation of new conduct and prudential risks and amplification or relocation of significantly old risks such as operational risk, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) risks, security, governance, and reputational risks. The widespread use of third party providers can also lead to concentration risk if a large number of undertakings become dependent on a small number of dominant outsourced or third party service providers. Thus, a fragmentation of the insurance value chain could occur, including a potential for a reduced regulatory and supervisory grip on the relevant activities in the value chain, or ways in which the lengthening of the value chain stresses existing regulatory and supervisory oversight.
As a consequence, supervision requires more attention to different companies involved throughout the value chain that must be supervised, or at least identified and overseen efficiently and effectively. Supervisors are also challenged to improve their information gathering, knowledge, experience, skillset, and resources for controlling new models and technologies while keeping up with the rapid changes. The consultation also highlights that Solvency II regular reporting might not be fit-for-purpose to have an overview of cooperation with all third parties and there might be a need for more flexible reporting. Similarly, although Solvency II Directive provides rules for outsourcing, it might be worth exploring additional practices for proper supervision of more fragmented value chains. Effort is also needed to avoid diverging supervisory outcomes between national competent authorities, particularly considering that the insurtech developments can often have a cross-border and cross-sector impact. As per EIOPA, the possible areas for further work include the following:
- More specific analysis of possible regulatory responses to third parties in the value chain. This could include exploring ways of getting better overview on market developments involving third parties active in the insurance value chain, including understanding ownership structures, partnership agreements, and new forms of outsourcing to assess who underwrites the risk and where risks are concentrated.
- A follow-up study focusing on the impact of platforms and ecosystems and their practical supervision (licensing, outsourcing, consumer protection, product oversight, and governance rules), including the application of EU law and possible gaps.
- Adapting disclosures and advice requirements to the digital world, based on an assessment of customer capabilities and new behavior patterns and ways of providing information and advice.
- Further analyses of broader measures that might underpin sound digital markets in insurance and insurance related data.
EIOPA is expecting, from interested parties, views on whether they agree with its view of the risks and benefits and whether they have any comments or additional proposals on proposed solutions or next steps. EIOPA will work further with the national competent authorities on supervisory responses to further support supervisors and supervisory convergence, while maintaining a strong and open dialog with the market and other stakeholders.
Comment Due Date: September 07, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Reinsurance, Operational Risk, Governance, Cyber Risk, Concentration Risk, Insurtech, Cloud Computing, Solvency II, Reporting, EIOPA
Previous ArticleECB Report Examines Quality of Lending Practices of Banks
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.