Featured Product

    PRA on Modification by Consent of Definition of Capital Rules in CRR 2

    June 10, 2019

    PRA announced its decision to offer a modification by consent of the Rules 7.1 and 7.5 of the Definition of Capital Part of the PRA Rulebook. This is because of the amendments introduced by the recently published revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR II) in the Official Journal of the European Union, which includes certain requirements that enter into force from June 27, 2019. The changes under discussion relate to the classification of common equity tier 1 (CET1) instruments.

  • The information to be provided by a third party seeking authorization to assess the compliance of securitizations with the STS criteria provided for in Securitization Regulation should enable a competent authority to evaluate whether and, to what extent, the applicant meets the conditions of Article 28(1) of the Securitization Regulation. An authorized third party will be able to provide STS assessment services across EU. The application for authorization should, therefore, comprehensively identify that third party, any group to which this third party belongs, and the scope of its activities. With regard to the STS assessment services to be provided, the application should include the envisaged scope of the services to be provided as well as their geographical scope, particularly the following:

    • To facilitate effective use of the authorization resources of a competent authority, each application for authorization should include a table clearly identifying each submitted document and its relevance to the conditions that must be met for authorization.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the fees charged by the third party are non-discriminatory and are sufficient and appropriate to cover the costs for the provision of the STS assessment services, as required by Article 28(1)(a) of Securitization Regulation, the third party should provide comprehensive information on pricing policies, pricing criteria, fee structures, and fee schedules.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party is able to ensure the integrity and independence of the STS assessment process, that third party should provide information on the structure of those internal controls. Furthermore, the third party should provide comprehensive information on the composition of the management body and on the qualifications and repute of each of its members.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party has sufficient operational safeguards and internal processes to assess STS compliance, the third party should provide information on its procedures relating to the required qualification of its staff. The third party should also demonstrate that its STS assessment methodology is sensitive to the type of securitization and that specifies separate procedures and safeguards for asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) transactions/programs and non-ABCP securitizations.

    The use of outsourcing arrangements and a reliance on the use of external experts can raise concerns about the robustness of operational safeguards and internal processes. The application should, therefore, contain specific information about the nature and scope of any such outsourcing arrangements or use of external experts as well as the third party's governance over those arrangements. Regulation (EU) 2019/885 is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by ESMA to EC.

     

    Related Links

    Effective Date: June 18, 2019

    Press Release
  • Proposed Rule 1
  • Proposed Rule 2
  • Proposed Rule 3
  • Presentation on Regulatory Framework (PDF)
  • Presentation on Resolution Plan Rules (PDF)
  • Following amendments to CRR Article 26(3), firms may classify as CET1 instruments the subsequent issuances of a form of CET1 instruments for which they have already received the competent authority’s permission, where both of the following conditions are met:

    • The provisions governing those subsequent issuances are substantially the same as the provisions governing those issuances for which the firms have already received permission.
    • Firms have notified those subsequent issuances to the competent authorities sufficiently in advance of their classification as CET1 instruments.

    In light of the change to CRR Article 26(3), PRA recognizes that Rules 7.1 and 7.5 of the Definition of Capital Part of the PRA Rulebook no longer achieve the purpose for which they were made. Therefore, it has been decided to offer a modification by consent. PRA intends to consult in due course on amending Chapter 7 of the Definition of Capital Part of the PRA Rulebook and any expectations it has from firms on the application of CRR Article 26(3). A firm wishing to take up this modification by consent should contact the Authorizations Division with a request for the modification. PRA will confirm in writing whether the request has been granted and will publish the approved modification direction on the Financial Services Register.

    Furthermore, CRR II introduces new requirements for UK global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) and UK material subsidiaries of non-EU G-SIBs in respect of own funds and eligible liabilities: some of these requirements will enter into force on June 27, 2019, while other aspects will apply in later years. BoE, in its capacity as the resolution authority, intends to communicate directly with affected firms in due course regarding these new own funds and eligible liabilities requirements. The BoE Statement of Policy on the approach to setting a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) should be read in compliance with the new CRR II requirements for those firms that are affected by the requirements. As previously communicated, BoE is also committed to, before the end of 2020, reviewing the calibration of MREL and the final compliance date, prior to setting end-state MRELs. In doing so, BoE will have regard to any intervening changes in the UK regulatory framework as well as firms’ experience in issuing liabilities to meet their interim MRELs.  

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, CRR 2, CET 1, Definition of Capital, MREL, G-SIB, PRA, BoE

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    FSB Examines Financial Stability Aspects of Bigtech and Cloud Services

    FSB published two reports that consider the financial stability implications from the offering of financial services by bigtech firms and the adoption of cloud computing and data services across a range of functions at financial institutions.

    December 09, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Specifies Capital Treatment of Equity Investments in ABGF

    APRA published a letter to the authorized deposit-taking institutions outlining the regulatory capital treatment of their equity investments in the Australian Business Growth Fund (ABGF).

    December 09, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Action Plan on Sustainable Finance

    EBA published the Action Plan on sustainable finance for banks.

    December 06, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for December 2019

    EBA updated the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool with answers to three questions under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and the second Payment Services Directive (PSD 2).

    December 06, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Publishes Proposal to Increase Transparency of Banking Data

    APRA proposed to substantially increase the volume and breadth of data it makes publicly available on authorized deposit-taking institutions, including banks, credit unions, and building societies.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Consults on Guide to Internal Controls for Credit Rating Agencies

    ESMA launched a consultation on the guidelines on internal controls for credit rating agencies (CRAs).

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Finalizes Directive and Prudential Rules for Investment Firms

    EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, the Directive (2019/2034) and Regulation (2019/2033) on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Revises Guideline on Principles for Management of Liquidity Risk

    OSFI finalized Guideline B-6 on the principles for the management of liquidity risk.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESAs Publish Draft Amendments to Bilateral Margin Requirements

    ESAs published joint draft regulatory technical standards to amend the Delegated Regulation on the risk mitigation techniques for non-cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives as well as a joint statement on the introduction of fallbacks in OTC derivative contracts and the requirement to exchange collateral.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    RBNZ Releases Final Decisions Related to Capital Review for Banks

    RBNZ released a paper that sets out its final decisions following the comprehensive review of its capital framework for banks, known as the Capital Review.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4289