Featured Product

    PRA on Modification by Consent of Definition of Capital Rules in CRR 2

    June 10, 2019

    PRA announced its decision to offer a modification by consent of the Rules 7.1 and 7.5 of the Definition of Capital Part of the PRA Rulebook. This is because of the amendments introduced by the recently published revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR II) in the Official Journal of the European Union, which includes certain requirements that enter into force from June 27, 2019. The changes under discussion relate to the classification of common equity tier 1 (CET1) instruments.

  • The information to be provided by a third party seeking authorization to assess the compliance of securitizations with the STS criteria provided for in Securitization Regulation should enable a competent authority to evaluate whether and, to what extent, the applicant meets the conditions of Article 28(1) of the Securitization Regulation. An authorized third party will be able to provide STS assessment services across EU. The application for authorization should, therefore, comprehensively identify that third party, any group to which this third party belongs, and the scope of its activities. With regard to the STS assessment services to be provided, the application should include the envisaged scope of the services to be provided as well as their geographical scope, particularly the following:

    • To facilitate effective use of the authorization resources of a competent authority, each application for authorization should include a table clearly identifying each submitted document and its relevance to the conditions that must be met for authorization.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the fees charged by the third party are non-discriminatory and are sufficient and appropriate to cover the costs for the provision of the STS assessment services, as required by Article 28(1)(a) of Securitization Regulation, the third party should provide comprehensive information on pricing policies, pricing criteria, fee structures, and fee schedules.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party is able to ensure the integrity and independence of the STS assessment process, that third party should provide information on the structure of those internal controls. Furthermore, the third party should provide comprehensive information on the composition of the management body and on the qualifications and repute of each of its members.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party has sufficient operational safeguards and internal processes to assess STS compliance, the third party should provide information on its procedures relating to the required qualification of its staff. The third party should also demonstrate that its STS assessment methodology is sensitive to the type of securitization and that specifies separate procedures and safeguards for asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) transactions/programs and non-ABCP securitizations.

    The use of outsourcing arrangements and a reliance on the use of external experts can raise concerns about the robustness of operational safeguards and internal processes. The application should, therefore, contain specific information about the nature and scope of any such outsourcing arrangements or use of external experts as well as the third party's governance over those arrangements. Regulation (EU) 2019/885 is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by ESMA to EC.


    Related Links

    Effective Date: June 18, 2019

    Press Release
  • Proposed Rule 1
  • Proposed Rule 2
  • Proposed Rule 3
  • Presentation on Regulatory Framework (PDF)
  • Presentation on Resolution Plan Rules (PDF)
  • Following amendments to CRR Article 26(3), firms may classify as CET1 instruments the subsequent issuances of a form of CET1 instruments for which they have already received the competent authority’s permission, where both of the following conditions are met:

    • The provisions governing those subsequent issuances are substantially the same as the provisions governing those issuances for which the firms have already received permission.
    • Firms have notified those subsequent issuances to the competent authorities sufficiently in advance of their classification as CET1 instruments.

    In light of the change to CRR Article 26(3), PRA recognizes that Rules 7.1 and 7.5 of the Definition of Capital Part of the PRA Rulebook no longer achieve the purpose for which they were made. Therefore, it has been decided to offer a modification by consent. PRA intends to consult in due course on amending Chapter 7 of the Definition of Capital Part of the PRA Rulebook and any expectations it has from firms on the application of CRR Article 26(3). A firm wishing to take up this modification by consent should contact the Authorizations Division with a request for the modification. PRA will confirm in writing whether the request has been granted and will publish the approved modification direction on the Financial Services Register.

    Furthermore, CRR II introduces new requirements for UK global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) and UK material subsidiaries of non-EU G-SIBs in respect of own funds and eligible liabilities: some of these requirements will enter into force on June 27, 2019, while other aspects will apply in later years. BoE, in its capacity as the resolution authority, intends to communicate directly with affected firms in due course regarding these new own funds and eligible liabilities requirements. The BoE Statement of Policy on the approach to setting a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) should be read in compliance with the new CRR II requirements for those firms that are affected by the requirements. As previously communicated, BoE is also committed to, before the end of 2020, reviewing the calibration of MREL and the final compliance date, prior to setting end-state MRELs. In doing so, BoE will have regard to any intervening changes in the UK regulatory framework as well as firms’ experience in issuing liabilities to meet their interim MRELs.  


    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, CRR 2, CET 1, Definition of Capital, MREL, G-SIB, PRA, BoE

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles

    HKMA Finalizes Policy Modules on Group-Wide Approach and Remuneration

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.

    July 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Guide to Monitor Threshold for Intermediate Parent Undertakings

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).

    July 28, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    PRA Finalizes Approach to Supervision of International Banks

    In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    FCA Issues PS21/9 on Implementation of Investment Firms Regime

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Proposes Regulatory Standards to Identify Shadow Banking Entities

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    IOSCO Proposes Recommendations on ESG Ratings and Data Providers

    The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    ESMA Group Issues Recommendations on RFR Switch in Interdealer Market

    The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    ECB Study Assesses Impact of Basel III Finalization Package

    The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    ISDA Finds FRTB Results in Higher Capital Charges for Carbon Trading

    The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    PRA Updates Remuneration Policy Statement Templates and Tables

    The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7311