FSB launched a consultation on a report on the evaluation of the effects of financial regulatory reforms on small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) financing. This evaluation is a part of the broader examination of the effects of the G20 regulatory reforms on financial intermediation. The evaluation considers the impact of the implementation Basel III and accounting standards such as IFRS 9 and its equivalent in various jurisdictions. The consultation period for this report ends on August 07, 2019 and the final report on the evaluation will be published in November 2019. With this report, FSB also published a Technical Appendix that describes in detail the analytical approaches, data sources, and results of the empirical analysis.
The report first provides an overview of SME definitions and covers the overall structure, trends, and drivers in SME financing. It then outlines relevant reforms potentially affecting SME finance, also presenting their implementation timelines and possible transmission channels. Finally, the report presents the results and conclusions of the qualitative and empirical analysis on the overall assessment of the effects of the financial regulatory reforms on SME financing. The report also includes annexes with additional information on financial regulations potentially affecting SME financing; a stylized example of the impact of changes in regulatory capital to the cost of bank financing for SME lending. This evaluation report was delivered to G20 finance ministers and Central Bank governors for their meeting in Fukuoka on June 08-09, 2019.
For the reforms that are within the scope of this evaluation, the analysis thus far does not identify material and persistent negative effects on SME financing in general, although there is some differentiation across jurisdictions. There is some evidence that the more stringent risk-based capital requirements under Basel III slowed the pace and in some jurisdictions tightened the conditions of SME lending at those banks that were least capitalized relative to other banks. These effects are not homogeneous across jurisdictions and they are generally found to be temporary. The evaluation also provides some evidence for a reallocation of bank lending toward more creditworthy firms after the introduction of reforms, but this effect is not specific to SMEs. Additionally, the alternative, non-traditional forms of financing, such as fintech credit, have seen their importance increase in recent years, albeit from a low base. Other key conclusions of the report are as follows:
Impact of Basel III reforms. The report states that stakeholders identified Basel III as the most relevant reform impacting the provision of SME lending, although there were mixed views about its importance. A few of them also expressed the concern that Basel III imposed a disproportionate capital charge on equity investment in SMEs, thus discouraging such exposures vis-à-vis debt finance. By contrast, the leverage ratio and liquidity reforms (and in particular the liquidity coverage ratio, whose implementation is more advanced than for the net stable funding ratio) were found not to exert significant effects. In addition, some stakeholders commented that the cumulative costs of complying with financial regulations may be disproportionately higher for smaller credit institutions, thus offering incentives for them to focus on bigger loans, while others expressed concern about the apparent convergence in business models across large banks that may reduce diversity and build up systemic risks. Some stakeholders also noted that Basel III reforms were not the major constraint to SME financing; that loan maturities have lengthened in recent years; and that capital regulations have impacted countries differently, depending on how they were implemented by the authorities and how successful banks have been at raising capital.
Impact of accounting standard reforms. Changes to accounting standards for expected credit loss (ECL) were also cited by stakeholders as potentially affecting SME financing, although a comprehensive assessment of their impact is not possible at this stage. Stakeholder concerns about the effects of the new standards (IASB's IFRS 9 and the U.S. FASB's current expected credit loss (CECL) model) stem from worries about a sudden increase in loan-loss provisions and higher volatility of earnings in general, which may offer incentives to banks to reduce the maturity of SME loans, request higher collateralization, and reduce credit availability in a downturn. The presence and magnitude of any potential effects on SME financing will be substantially determined by the way banks implement the standard, as well as by factors such as the composition and quality of their credit assets. Given that the bulk of these changes will only come into effect in the coming years—IFRS 9 was only effective as of January 01, 2018 and CECL is not effective until 2020-21—a meaningful analysis of their effects on SME financing is not possible at present.
- Press Release
- Consultation Document (PDF)
- Technical Appendix (PDF)
- Template for Consultation Responses (DOCX)
Comment Due Date: August 07, 2019
Keywords: International, Banking, Accounting, Basel III, Proportionality, IFRS 9, Credit Risk, SME, Regulatory Reform, FSB
Previous ArticleDNB Revises Instructions for COREP Templates C09.01 and C09.02
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
In a response to the questions posed by a member of the European Parliament, the President Christine Lagarde highlighted the commitment of the European Central Bank (ECB) to an ambitious climate-related action plan along with a roadmap, which was published in July 2021.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The French Prudential Control and Resolution Authority (ACPR) published the corrective version of the RUBA taxonomy Version 1.0.1, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).