At the G7 Conference in Paris, Mr. Ignazio Visco, the Governor of the Bank of Italy, discussed the ongoing evolution of cyber risk in the financial sector and the ways to address this risk. Mr. Visco highlighted that in cyberspace externalities are not contained within national borders and that the increasing reliance on third-party suppliers who fall outside the jurisdiction of financial authorities is one important source of cyber risk for supervised entities. He outlined cross-industry and cross-border cooperation, issuance of common security standards for hardware and software, and the use of artificial intelligence by supervisory authorities as the means to deal with the increasing cyber-security issues.
In the past, attackers have leveraged vulnerabilities in the IT systems of third parties to strike financial institutions. In the G7 Fundamental Elements For Third Party Cyber Risk Management in the Financial Sector, which was published last year, tenets on the appropriate management of third-party risk were introduced. Work on implementation of these tenets must now be accelerated, said Mr. Visco. When it comes to third parties that operate in regulated sectors, such as energy and telecoms, the different authorities must step up their coordination and cooperation efforts. Within each country there needs to be a cohesive national system of cyber defense that allows different authorities to work together effectively. In this context, governments have a natural role as coordinators.
The financial sector remains a prime target and such risks cannot be effectively mitigated by simply mandating supervised entities to follow good practices. Complex attacks can be deployed via obscure tools. Even large financial institutions with excellent (and expensive) defense systems can be lost in the face of cutting-edge threats; they can, of course, work out some of the technical details, but they might miss some of the broader, systemic elements, simply because they ignore relevant information such as precedents that affected other sectors, attacker tactics, and effective defenses adopted elsewhere. This kind of information is generally available only to intelligence agencies and the military. Cross-sector, nationwide as well as international cooperation is, therefore, essential. There needs to be a mechanism in each country that allows appropriate public bodies to coordinate and jointly support, each within its own mandate, the victims of a cyber campaign. In EU, the Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive takes this course.
Next, he added that cooperation must extend beyond borders, given the nature of many of the attacks and the interconnectedness of the financial system. This will always be a challenge because disclosing vulnerabilities to entities from another jurisdiction might endanger national security. Nonetheless, feasible solutions need to be found for this problem, since this kind of information-sharing might prove crucial for responding to some attacks. He said that the G7 remains the most favorable context for international cooperation—the many achievements of the G7 Cyber Expert Group (CEG) provide a good example of what can be done. The CEG was established in 2015 under the German presidency and it went on to deliver results during the presidencies of four other countries—Japan, Italy, Canada, and France. "We need to persevere on this route," said Mr. Visco.
According to Mr. Visco, one area that is ripe for more cooperation is the establishment of common security standards for hardware and software, which also covers the growing market for financial technology apps. In EU, a new regulation (which is currently under approval) will introduce a mechanism of cybersecurity certification for many products. This is an important step, but it would be more effective if G7 countries could converge at least on a subset of requirements. "If a service is not safe according to our own laws, it should not be on the market—and there should be a reasonable degree of convergence between laws in like-minded jurisdictions." Finally, he highlighted that artificial intelligence introduces new possibilities in cyber-security. It facilitates the detection and the exploitation of vulnerabilities, which the attackers know; therefore, the attackers are starting to deploy machine learning to analyze and penetrate target systems. Cyber-security companies use the same artificial intelligence analytic tools, with the goal of fixing the weak spots. By the same token, authorities could employ artificial intelligence to ascertain whether supervised entities are meeting mandated security standards on a continuous basis, added Mr. Visco.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, EU, Italy, Banking, Cyber Risk, Cyber Security, Artificial Intelligence, Suptech, G7, Cross Border Cooperation, Systemic Risk, Operational Risk, Bank of Italy, BIS
Previous ArticleEC Publishes Equivalence Decisions for Several Non-EU Countries
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.