EC published the Implementing Regulation 2020/744, which amends the Implementing Regulation 2016/1800 that lays down implementing technical standards with regard to the allocation of credit assessments of external credit assessment institutions (ECAIs) to an objective scale of credit quality steps in accordance with the Solvency II Directive. The regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
The Annex to the finalized Regulation 2020/744 updates an Annex for Regulation 2016/1800, which is the regulation being amended. The Annex specifies the correspondence of the relevant credit assessments issued by an ECAI to the credit quality steps set out in Section 2 of Chapter I of Title I of the Delegated Regulation 2015/35 ("External credit assessments"). Following the latest amendments, by the Implementing Regulation 2018/633 to the Annex to Implementing Regulation 2016/1800, the quantitative and qualitative factors underpinning the credit assessments of some mappings in the Annex to the Implementing Regulation 2016/1800 have changed. In addition, some ECAIs have extended their credit assessments to new market segments, resulting in new rating scales and new credit rating types. It is, therefore, necessary to update the mappings of the ECAIs concerned.
Since the adoption of Implementing Regulation 2018/633, another credit rating agency has been registered in accordance with the EC Regulation No 1060/2009. In accordance with the Solvency II Directive, the allocation of credit assessments of ECAIs to an objective scale of credit quality steps for the purposes of the calculation of the solvency capital requirement needs to be consistent with the use of external credit assessments of ECAIs in the calculation of the capital requirements for credit institutions and financial institutions, as defined in the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR. As Article 136(1) of the CRR requires the specification of mappings for all ECAIs, it is necessary to provide a mapping for that newly registered ECAI. The credit assessments applied by the newly registered ECAI are based on the same methodology as those applied by its parent company, a third-country ECAI for which a mapping had already been established. It is, therefore, appropriate in this specific case that the mapping for the newly registered ECAI mirrors the mapping established for that third-country ECAI.
Regulation 2020/744 is based on the draft implementing technical standards submitted by ESAs (EBA, ESMA, and EIOPA) to EC. ESAs have conducted open public consultations on the draft implementing technical standards on which this regulation is based, analyzed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the opinion of the Banking Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of the EU Regulation No 1093/2010; the opinion of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of the EU Regulation No 1095/2010; and the opinion of the Insurance and Reinsurance Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of the EU Regulation No 1094/2010.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Credit Risk, Solvency II, CRR, Regulatory Capital, ECAIS, Credit Ratings, Credit Quality Steps, Credit Assessments, Regulation 2020/744, EC
Previous ArticleBIS Studies Financial Resilience of Households Amid COVID Crisis
The European Commission (EC) published a report summarizing responses to the targeted consultation on the supervisory convergence and the single rulebook in the European Union (EU).
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an update on the discussion paper that intended to engage federally regulated financial institutions and other interested stakeholders in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on a proposal for a regulation on European green bonds, following a request from the European Parliament.
The Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that explores the expected impact of digitalization on provision of financial and banking services, and proposes policy measures to address the risks stemming from digitalization.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) announced that the guidelines on the reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures COVID-relief measures shall continue to apply until further notice.
The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FI) announced that the capital adequacy reporting as at December 31, 2021 must be done by February 11, 2022.
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0.