BIS published a Bulletin (or a short report) that reviews the response of the central banks of the United States, the euro area, Japan, the United Kingdom and Canada to the disruptions caused by COVID-19 pandemic. An appendix accompanying the Bulletin provides further details on the policy measures announced by the central banks in these geographies and describes the assumptions underlying the projections presented in the Bulletin. The Bulletin highlights that central banks responded promptly and forcefully, consistent with their mandates, to preserve smooth market functioning and an effective transmission of monetary policy.
The initial response of central banks was focused primarily on easing financial stress and ensuring a smooth flow of credit to the private non-financial sector. The pandemic triggered complementary responses from monetary and fiscal authorities. Fiscal backstops and loan guarantees supported central bank actions. Asset purchases, designed to achieve central banks’ objectives, helped contain the costs of fiscal expansions. Overall, by addressing credit risk concerns, fiscal support complemented monetary policies directed at sustaining credit to the non-financial private sector.
Looking ahead, the footprint of central banks’ measures on their balance sheet are likely to be seen for a prolonged period. While liquidity and short-term lending programs can be easily reabsorbed at the time of the recovery, assets purchased are typically held to maturity. Under conservative assumptions about the share of outstanding assets purchased by central banks under each program and a plausible take-up and rollover of lending operations, the authors project the size of central banks’ balance sheets to expand in 2020 at a faster pace than ever before. With the outbreak of COVID-19, earlier hopes of ending up in a pre-global financial crisis (GFC) environment characterized by lean central bank balance sheets over the near future have faded away.
Keywords: International, Banking, COVID-19, Loan Guarantee, Credit Risk, Central Bank Balance Sheets, Policy Actions, BIS
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleBCRA Updates Capital Requirements and Information Regime Rules
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.