Featured Product

    Lyndon Nelson of BoE on Ensuring Operational Resilience in Cyber Era

    June 05, 2019

    Lyndon Nelson, Deputy CEO and Executive Director, Regulatory Operations and Supervisory Risk Specialists, spoke in London about the ongoing work to ensure operational resilience in the financial services sector in UK, particularly in the face of increasing cyber threats. BoE expects to publish a discussion paper on operational resilience, which would contain recommendations for both the industry and regulators.

  • The information to be provided by a third party seeking authorization to assess the compliance of securitizations with the STS criteria provided for in Securitization Regulation should enable a competent authority to evaluate whether and, to what extent, the applicant meets the conditions of Article 28(1) of the Securitization Regulation. An authorized third party will be able to provide STS assessment services across EU. The application for authorization should, therefore, comprehensively identify that third party, any group to which this third party belongs, and the scope of its activities. With regard to the STS assessment services to be provided, the application should include the envisaged scope of the services to be provided as well as their geographical scope, particularly the following:

    • To facilitate effective use of the authorization resources of a competent authority, each application for authorization should include a table clearly identifying each submitted document and its relevance to the conditions that must be met for authorization.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the fees charged by the third party are non-discriminatory and are sufficient and appropriate to cover the costs for the provision of the STS assessment services, as required by Article 28(1)(a) of Securitization Regulation, the third party should provide comprehensive information on pricing policies, pricing criteria, fee structures, and fee schedules.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party is able to ensure the integrity and independence of the STS assessment process, that third party should provide information on the structure of those internal controls. Furthermore, the third party should provide comprehensive information on the composition of the management body and on the qualifications and repute of each of its members.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party has sufficient operational safeguards and internal processes to assess STS compliance, the third party should provide information on its procedures relating to the required qualification of its staff. The third party should also demonstrate that its STS assessment methodology is sensitive to the type of securitization and that specifies separate procedures and safeguards for asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) transactions/programs and non-ABCP securitizations.

    The use of outsourcing arrangements and a reliance on the use of external experts can raise concerns about the robustness of operational safeguards and internal processes. The application should, therefore, contain specific information about the nature and scope of any such outsourcing arrangements or use of external experts as well as the third party's governance over those arrangements. Regulation (EU) 2019/885 is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by ESMA to EC.

     

    Related Links

    Effective Date: June 18, 2019

    Press Release
  • Proposed Rule 1
  • Proposed Rule 2
  • Proposed Rule 3
  • Presentation on Regulatory Framework (PDF)
  • Presentation on Resolution Plan Rules (PDF)
  • In his speech, Mr. Nelson highlights the importance of a strong collaboration when it comes to building resilience in the financial sector. He mentioned that, last year, the UK authorities had issued a discussion paper, setting out an ambitious and innovative outcome-based approach to enhancing operational resilience of the UK finance sector. At a policy level, the paper set out that firms should assume that operational disruption would occur and plan accordingly. The paper has received very positive feedback from industry and globally, particularly its outcome-based approach and the concept of impact tolerance but it also raised issues that require clarification, most notably the family tree of operational risk, operational resilience, operational continuity in resolution, and a number of other terms. The UK authorities will respond to this and other questions in the Autumn.  He also mentioned that the discussion paper is a joint document from different authorities such as the Financial Policy Committee, FCA, BoE's Financial Market Infrastructure supervisors, and PRA. This reflects how highly prized BoE considers collaboration to be in this area.

    Next, he offered an overview of the activities of the Cross-Market Operational Resilience Group (CMORG), which was historically chaired exclusively by BoE, but has now been re-shaped with the introduction of a co-chair structure—"I now co-chair with UK Finance." said Mr. Nelson. The most visible of CMORG’s activities is to support a regular cross-sector operational exercise program, which helps industry and authorities alike understand our operational capabilities when things go wrong and build capabilities to address these before they do. In addressing the threat from Cyber, BoE welcomes the announcement by UK Finance of the formation of the Financial Sector Cyber Collaboration Center, which promises to bring a step change to industry collaboration and, therefore, defensive capabilities on cyber. This is a great example of where firms can address risks that are unmanageable by firms individually by tackling the problem for the broader public good. There is still room for industry to go further. The last sector exercise identified a number of areas that lend themselves to this approach and a report will be released shortly about these. However, the key points are:

    • Developing ideas on how to protect systems and data more robustly against both accidental and deliberate damage
    • Balancing system availability with protecting data integrity during periods of operational stress
    • How to secure data against permanent loss, so that we can absolutely guarantee data integrity and availability
    • How to resume key services safely when disruptions have occurred, without losing data, damaging integrity, or causing contagion into the wider financial system

    Mr. Nelson said that these are all complex issues, which neither regulator nor firms can fix in isolation, but they do define the key operational disruptions scenarios for which better solutions are needed compared to those we have today. He concluded, that, in the next ten to twenty years, there is an opportunity to add to the many advantages of the UK by making it one of the most operationally resilient locations anywhere in the world. "Imagine being able to justifiably claim that even with operational disruption payments can be made and business can still be conducted after only a short delay. As a central bank and a regulator we are ready to take up the challenge."

     

    Related Link: Speech

     

    Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Cyber Risk, Operational Resilience, Cyber Testing, International Cooperation, CMORG, Operational Risk, PRA, BoE

    Related Articles
    News

    EBA Updates List of Validation Rules for Reporting by Banks

    EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.

    September 10, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Responds to EC Call for Advice to Strengthen AML/CFT Framework

    EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).

    September 10, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    NGFS Advocates Environmental Risk Analysis for Financial Sector

    NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.

    September 10, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Issues Guidelines to Promote Senior Management Accountability

    MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.

    September 10, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Formalizes Capital Treatment and Reporting of COVID-19 Loans

    APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.

    September 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    SRB Chair Discusses Path to Harmonized Liquidation Regime for Banks

    SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.

    September 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Workshop Discusses Preliminary Findings of Too-Big-To-Fail Reforms

    FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.

    September 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Updates List of Supervised Entities in EU in September 2020

    ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.

    September 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Identifies Focus Areas to Strengthen Third-Party Risk Management

    OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.

    September 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Extends Implementation Timeline for Framework on SFTs

    FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.

    September 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5796