Featured Product

    Lyndon Nelson of BoE on Ensuring Operational Resilience in Cyber Era

    June 05, 2019

    Lyndon Nelson, Deputy CEO and Executive Director, Regulatory Operations and Supervisory Risk Specialists, spoke in London about the ongoing work to ensure operational resilience in the financial services sector in UK, particularly in the face of increasing cyber threats. BoE expects to publish a discussion paper on operational resilience, which would contain recommendations for both the industry and regulators.

  • The information to be provided by a third party seeking authorization to assess the compliance of securitizations with the STS criteria provided for in Securitization Regulation should enable a competent authority to evaluate whether and, to what extent, the applicant meets the conditions of Article 28(1) of the Securitization Regulation. An authorized third party will be able to provide STS assessment services across EU. The application for authorization should, therefore, comprehensively identify that third party, any group to which this third party belongs, and the scope of its activities. With regard to the STS assessment services to be provided, the application should include the envisaged scope of the services to be provided as well as their geographical scope, particularly the following:

    • To facilitate effective use of the authorization resources of a competent authority, each application for authorization should include a table clearly identifying each submitted document and its relevance to the conditions that must be met for authorization.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the fees charged by the third party are non-discriminatory and are sufficient and appropriate to cover the costs for the provision of the STS assessment services, as required by Article 28(1)(a) of Securitization Regulation, the third party should provide comprehensive information on pricing policies, pricing criteria, fee structures, and fee schedules.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party is able to ensure the integrity and independence of the STS assessment process, that third party should provide information on the structure of those internal controls. Furthermore, the third party should provide comprehensive information on the composition of the management body and on the qualifications and repute of each of its members.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party has sufficient operational safeguards and internal processes to assess STS compliance, the third party should provide information on its procedures relating to the required qualification of its staff. The third party should also demonstrate that its STS assessment methodology is sensitive to the type of securitization and that specifies separate procedures and safeguards for asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) transactions/programs and non-ABCP securitizations.

    The use of outsourcing arrangements and a reliance on the use of external experts can raise concerns about the robustness of operational safeguards and internal processes. The application should, therefore, contain specific information about the nature and scope of any such outsourcing arrangements or use of external experts as well as the third party's governance over those arrangements. Regulation (EU) 2019/885 is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by ESMA to EC.

     

    Related Links

    Effective Date: June 18, 2019

    Press Release
  • Proposed Rule 1
  • Proposed Rule 2
  • Proposed Rule 3
  • Presentation on Regulatory Framework (PDF)
  • Presentation on Resolution Plan Rules (PDF)
  • In his speech, Mr. Nelson highlights the importance of a strong collaboration when it comes to building resilience in the financial sector. He mentioned that, last year, the UK authorities had issued a discussion paper, setting out an ambitious and innovative outcome-based approach to enhancing operational resilience of the UK finance sector. At a policy level, the paper set out that firms should assume that operational disruption would occur and plan accordingly. The paper has received very positive feedback from industry and globally, particularly its outcome-based approach and the concept of impact tolerance but it also raised issues that require clarification, most notably the family tree of operational risk, operational resilience, operational continuity in resolution, and a number of other terms. The UK authorities will respond to this and other questions in the Autumn.  He also mentioned that the discussion paper is a joint document from different authorities such as the Financial Policy Committee, FCA, BoE's Financial Market Infrastructure supervisors, and PRA. This reflects how highly prized BoE considers collaboration to be in this area.

    Next, he offered an overview of the activities of the Cross-Market Operational Resilience Group (CMORG), which was historically chaired exclusively by BoE, but has now been re-shaped with the introduction of a co-chair structure—"I now co-chair with UK Finance." said Mr. Nelson. The most visible of CMORG’s activities is to support a regular cross-sector operational exercise program, which helps industry and authorities alike understand our operational capabilities when things go wrong and build capabilities to address these before they do. In addressing the threat from Cyber, BoE welcomes the announcement by UK Finance of the formation of the Financial Sector Cyber Collaboration Center, which promises to bring a step change to industry collaboration and, therefore, defensive capabilities on cyber. This is a great example of where firms can address risks that are unmanageable by firms individually by tackling the problem for the broader public good. There is still room for industry to go further. The last sector exercise identified a number of areas that lend themselves to this approach and a report will be released shortly about these. However, the key points are:

    • Developing ideas on how to protect systems and data more robustly against both accidental and deliberate damage
    • Balancing system availability with protecting data integrity during periods of operational stress
    • How to secure data against permanent loss, so that we can absolutely guarantee data integrity and availability
    • How to resume key services safely when disruptions have occurred, without losing data, damaging integrity, or causing contagion into the wider financial system

    Mr. Nelson said that these are all complex issues, which neither regulator nor firms can fix in isolation, but they do define the key operational disruptions scenarios for which better solutions are needed compared to those we have today. He concluded, that, in the next ten to twenty years, there is an opportunity to add to the many advantages of the UK by making it one of the most operationally resilient locations anywhere in the world. "Imagine being able to justifiably claim that even with operational disruption payments can be made and business can still be conducted after only a short delay. As a central bank and a regulator we are ready to take up the challenge."

     

    Related Link: Speech

     

    Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Cyber Risk, Operational Resilience, Cyber Testing, International Cooperation, CMORG, Operational Risk, PRA, BoE

    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Revises Standard on Margin Rules for Uncleared Derivatives

    APRA revised CPS 226, which is the prudential standard on margin and risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

    September 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Issues Consultation on Prudent Person Principle Under Solvency II

    PRA, via the consultation paper CP22/19, has set out its proposed expectations for investment by firms, in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle (PPP).

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Forms Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance

    EIOPA established the Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance to assist EIOPA in the development of digital responsibility principles in insurance.

    September 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FDIC Approves Proposal to Amend Swap Margin Rule

    FDIC approved what would be a joint proposal by the US Agencies (FCA, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) to amend regulations that require swap dealers and security-based swap dealers under the agencies’ respective jurisdictions to exchange margin with their counterparties for swaps that are not centrally cleared (Swap Margin Rule).

    September 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes Taxonomy Changes Related to Topics 848 and 470

    FASB proposed taxonomy improvements for the proposed Accounting Standards Update on topic 848 on facilitation of effects of reference rate reform on financial reporting.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Statement on Recalculating Transitional Measures Under Solvency II

    BoE notified that it will be willing to accept applications from firms to recalculate transitional measure on technical provisions (TMTP) as at September 30, 2019.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Hosts Conference to Discuss Issues from Emergence of Stablecoins

    BIS hosted a conference in Basel to discuss policy and regulatory issues posed by the emergence of stablecoin initiatives backed by financial institutions and large technology companies.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Paper on Embedded Supervision of Blockchain-Based Financial Market

    BIS published a working paper that investigates ways to regulate and supervise blockchain-based financial markets.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Paper on Market-Implied Systemic Risk and Shadow Capital Adequacy

    BoE published a working paper that presents a forward-looking approach to measure systemic solvency risk.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Consults on Policy Module on Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Process

    HKMA is consulting on the revised Supervisory Policy Manual module CA-G-5 that sets out the HKMA approach to conducting the supervisory review process under Pillar 2.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3830