OSFI has decided to set the level of the Domestic Stability Buffer at 2.00% of total risk-weighted assets, as calculated under the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline. The buffer has been set at this level, with effect from October 31, 2019. The Domestic Stability Buffer applies only to the federally regulated financial institutions that have been designated as domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs).
In December 2018, the Domestic Stability Buffer had been set at 1.75%, with effect from April 30, 2019. As of June 2019, the federally regulated financial institutions that have been designated as D-SIBs are Bank of Montreal, Bank of Nova Scotia, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, National Bank of Canada, Royal Bank of Canada, and Toronto-Dominion Bank. This increase in the buffer (to 2%) reflects the OSFI assessment that, on balance, the identified systemic vulnerabilities to D-SIBs in Canada remain elevated while economic conditions continue to be accommodative. The key vulnerabilities include Canadian household indebtedness, asset imbalances in the Canadian market, and Canadian institutional indebtedness. Household debt-to-income ratio has remained high since the last domestic stability buffer decision, housing market uncertainty remains elevated, and risks related to non-financial corporate debt have continued to grow. Against this backdrop, a favorable credit environment and stable economic conditions continue to provide a window of opportunity for D-SIBs to increase their capital holdings.
The Domestic Stability Buffer contributes to D-SIBs' resilience to key vulnerabilities and system-wide risks, thus contributing to financial stability. OSFI reviews and sets the level of the Domestic Stability Buffer on a semi-annual basis (June and December), based on its ongoing monitoring of federally regulated financial institutions as well as system-wide and sectoral developments. Decisions on the calibration of the buffer are based on the OSFI supervisory judgment, are informed by its monitoring and analytical work on a range of vulnerabilities, and are made in consultation with the federal financial regulatory partners of OSFI. OSFI applies a variety of qualitative analysis and quantitative tools to the determination of the buffer, including consideration of exposure trends, financial and macro economic indicators, stress testing and other supervisory information.
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Basel III, Domestic Stability Buffer, D-SIBs, Capital Adequacy, Systemic Risk, OSFI
Previous ArticleOCC Extends Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Deadline to November 25, 2019
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.