FSB Report Examines Ways to Address Market Fragmentation
FSB published a report that examines market fragmentation arising from regulatory and supervisory policies and identifies several work areas to address this issue. The report focuses on instances where reducing market fragmentation might have a positive impact on financial stability or might improve market efficiency, without any detrimental effect on financial stability. The report was delivered to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors ahead of their meetings in Fukuoka on June 08–09, 2019.
In response to a proposal by the Japanese G20 Presidency, FSB explored issues around market fragmentation and considered tools to address them, where appropriate. The report looks at some examples of financial activities where supervisory practices and regulatory policies may give rise to market fragmentation. It discusses potential trade-offs that authorities have considered between the benefits of increased cross-border activity and a need to tailor domestic regulatory frameworks to local conditions and mandates. Areas the report examines include the following:
- Trading and clearing of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives across borders
- Banks’ cross-border management of capital and liquidity
- Sharing of data and other information internationally
The report lays out approaches and mechanisms that may enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of international cooperation and help to mitigate any negative effects of market fragmentation on financial stability. The report identifies several areas for further work to address market fragmentation and will review the progress on the work in November 2019. The identified work areas are expected to facilitate further analysis and discussion of approaches and mechanisms for more efficient and effective cross-border cooperation among authorities. Such areas for further work include the following:
- Exploring ways to, where justified, enhance the clarity of deference and recognition processes in derivatives markets
- Strengthening the understanding of approaches by supervisory and resolution authorities towards pre-positioning of capital and liquidity by international banks
- Considering ways to enhance supervisory communication and information sharing, including approaches and mechanisms to avoid future fragmentation
- Considering whether there is evidence of market fragmentation with observed consequences for financial stability as part of the FSB’s ongoing evaluation of the effects of too-big-to-fail reforms
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Market Fragmentation, G20, Financial Stability, Cross-Border Activities, OTC Derivatives, Too Big to Fail, FSB
Previous Article
FSB Publishes User Guide for Overnight Risk-Free RatesRelated Articles
News
APRA Updates Lists of Validation and Derivation Rules in December 2019APRA updated the lists of the Direct to APRA (D2A) validation and derivation rules for authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation entities.
December 13, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
APRA Finalizes Prudential Standard for Credit Risk Management of BanksAPRA updated the prudential standard on credit risk management requirements (APS 220) for authorized deposit-taking institutions, post a public consultation.
December 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
EIOPA Consults on Guidelines on ICT Security and GovernanceEIOPA issued a consultation on guidelines on the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) security and governance by insurers.
December 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
BCBS Consults on Design of Prudential Treatment for Crypto-AssetsBCBS published a discussion paper on the design of prudential treatment for crypto-asset exposures of banks.
December 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
NCUA Approves Delay of Risk-Based Capital Rules Until January 2022The NCUA Board held its eleventh open meeting of 2019 and approved a final rule to delay the effective date of the risk-based capital rules for credit unions to January 01, 2022.
December 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
APRA Issues Operational Risk Rules, Consults on Reporting RequirementsAPRA published an updated prudential standard APS 115 that sets out operational risk requirements for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
December 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
ESMA Updates Q&A on European Benchmarks Regulation in December 2019ESMA updated the question and answers (Q&A) document on the European Benchmarks Regulation.
December 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
APRA Decides to Keep Countercyclical Capital Buffer for Banks at 0%APRA announced its decision to keep the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for authorized deposit-taking institutions on hold at zero percent.
December 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
ESMA on Draft Amendments to Indices and Recognized Exchanges Under CRRESMA issued the final report on draft amendments to the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1646, which specifies the main indices and recognized exchanges, under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), that are relevant to credit institutions and investment firms subject to prudential requirements and trading venues.
December 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
FED Extends Consultation Period for Capital Requirements for InsurersFED is extending comment period for the proposed rule establishing risk-based capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are significantly engaged in insurance activities.
December 10, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|