IMF published, under the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), a technical note on cooperative banks and credit unions in the Republic of Poland. The technical note reviews the situation in cooperative bank and credit union sectors, both of which are in states of transition; the regulatory and supervisory arrangements; and the safety net and resolution regime within the context of the crisis management framework. The note also offers perspectives on the sustainability of institutional models and these sectors within a modernizing and competitive banking sector.
The note highlights that most cooperative banks and credit unions are stable, but each sector has its own issues. The FSAP is broadly supportive of the policy direction for cooperatives, while it questions whether the credit union sector should remain standalone. Combined, cooperative banks and credit unions represent less than 8% of deposit takers, though more importantly they serve about 18% of the population. The overall situation of most cooperative banks is that they remain well-capitalized, with moderate levels of non-performing loans (NPLs) largely in line with the overall banking system, though with weak profitability. The NPLs are noted to be higher among larger cooperative banks, which represent about 65% of the cooperative bank sector assets. A vast majority of cooperative banks meet the regulatory capital requirements but raising capital from members or external sources, when needed, is complicated by applicable regulations and the dividend policies of cooperative banks.
Despite improvements in recent years, the performance of credit unions and the quality of their financial information is not yet satisfactory. Since coming under the supervision by Polish Financial Supervision Authority (PFSA), there has been some improvement in the credit union sector mainly due to the resolution of nonviable credit unions and better performance of the remaining entities. These improvements, however, are not sufficient to reverse the deterioration in the system thus far. The capital adequacy of the credit union sector at the end of January 2018 remains below the regulatory minimum of 5%, reflecting the troubled situation of larger credit unions. The source of low capital adequacy has been losses from poor loan underwriting and a series of past mergers that were allowed without addressing viability issues.
The technical note contains a table that summarizes several key recommendations to authorities in Poland. These recommendations relate to supervision and reforms in the cooperative bank and credit union sectors. The key recommendations with respect to supervision are as follows:
- Strengthen the supervisory capacity of PFSA by increasing (at least during a transition period) the available resources to oversee the cooperative banks and credit union sectors.
- Strengthen the quality of the Institutional Protection Scheme internal control and audit practices to align with PFSA supervisory requirements. Moreover, each affiliating bank should meet higher capital requirements.
- Revise the reporting requirements and supervision methodologies for cooperative banks and credit unions to ensure proportionality as far as feasible under applicable EU regulations.
- Evaluate the definition of criteria for auditors of the different institutions; if feasible, establish a short list of qualified auditors for the different types of entities, considering their complexity.
- Further enhance the monitoring by the Institutional Protection Scheme, align methodologies with PFSA.
- Further enhance the monitoring of all cooperative banks—including through a shortening in the supervisory inspection cycle—until relevant capacity is established in the Institutional Protection Schemes.
- Identify additional cooperative bank capital instruments that are compatible within the EU Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR.
- Unify accounting standards among sectors and institutions.
Related Link: Technical Note
Keywords: Europe, EU, Poland, Banking, FSAP, Technical Note, Credit Unions, Cooperative Banks, PFSA, Proportionality, CRR, IMF
Previous ArticleFSB Consults on Solvent Wind-Down of Trading Portfolios of G-SIBs
BCBS is consulting on the principles for operational resilience and the revisions to the principles for sound management of operational risk for banks.
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
HKMA, together with the Banking Sector Small and Medium-Size Enterprise (SME) Lending Coordination Mechanism, announced a ninety-day repayment deferment for trade facilities under the Pre-approved Principal Payment Holiday Scheme.
The Advisory Scientific Committee of ESRB published a response, in the form of an Insights Paper, to the EBA proposals for reforms to the stress testing framework in EU.
MAS announced several initiatives to support adoption of the Singapore Overnight Rate Average (SORA), which is administered by MAS.
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.
PRA published the policy statement PS19/20 on the final policy for extending coverage under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) for Temporary High Balance.
EBA published the final draft implementing technical standards for disclosures and reporting on the minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) and the total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) requirements in EU.
EBA published an erratum for the phase 2 of technical package on the reporting framework 2.10.
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2020/1145, which lays down technical information for calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds.