ESAs Clarify Key Areas of Regulatory Standards Under SFDR
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a statement providing clarifications on the draft regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR: Regulation 2019/2088), including the financial product disclosures under the Taxonomy Regulation.
This recent statement is part of the ESAs’ (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) ongoing efforts to promote a better understanding of disclosures required under the technical standards of the SFDR, ahead of the planned application of the rules on January 01, 2023; the rules are laid out in the Delegated Regulation adopted by the European Commission on April 06, 2022. The statement provides clarification on key areas of the SFDR disclosures, including:
- use of sustainability indicators
- principal adverse impact disclosures
- financial product disclosures as well as direct and indirect investments
- taxonomy-related financial product disclosures
- “do not significantly harm” disclosures
- disclosures for products with investment options
The ESAs clarify that the “sustainability indicators” and the indicators for principal adverse impact referred to in Article 4 SFDR and Chapter II & Annex I of the draft regulatory technical standards in the ESAs’ final reports refer to different disclosures under the SFDR. However, it is possible to use the indicators for principal adverse impact to measure the environmental or social characteristics or the overall sustainable impact of the financial product, for example, by showing improvements of the investments against those indicators over time. For calculation of indicators on greenhouse gas emissions, ESAs note that in some cases an investee company’s emissions may change throughout a reference period and the size of the investment in that company may evolve too. Thus, for the purposes of the disclosures of principal adverse impacts of investment decisions on sustainability factors, the impact assessment should be based on, at least, the average of four calculations made on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 of a calendar year reference period. ESAs also clarify that disclosure of the top holdings of the product in the periodic disclosures for financial products should be understood to require the identification of the country in which the investment is made or the investee company is headquartered or where a financial product is domiciled.
With respect to the taxonomy-related financial product disclosures, ESAs clarify that the taxonomy-alignment of the aggregated investments should be represented in the form of a bar chart, and be expressed by turnover, capital expenditure and operating expenditure. Furthermore, the disclosures require a breakdown of the proportion of each of the environmental objectives set out in Article 9 Taxonomy Regulation to which the sustainable investments contributed. Furthermore, ESAs consider that the calculation of the Taxonomy-alignment of a financial product investing in another financial product (including funds of funds) should be based on the market value of the proportion of Taxonomy-aligned investments of the latter. Overall, the ESAs note that they will continue to promote a better understanding of the regulatory technical standards as adopted in the Delegated Regulation under the SFDR through practical application questions and answers, after the publication of the Delegated Regulation in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, Banking, Insurance, Securities, ESG, Climate Change Risk, Sustainable Finance, Disclosures, Basel, Pillar 3, SFDR, Taxonomy Regulation, Regulatory Technical Standards, ESAs, Headline
Featured Experts

María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer

Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.

Michael Denton, PhD, PE
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
Related Articles
EBA Clarifies Use of COVID-19-Impacted Data for IRB Credit Risk Models
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
EP Reaches Agreement on Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
PRA Consults on Model Risk Management Principles for Banks
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
EC Regulation Amends Standards for Calculating Credit Risk Adjustments
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
BIS Hub Updates Work Program for 2022, Announces New Projects
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
EIOPA Issues Cyber Underwriting Proposal, Statement on Open Insurance
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
US Senate Members Seek Details on SEC Proposed Climate Disclosure Rule
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
EIOPA Consults on Review of Securitization Framework in Solvency II
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
UK Authorities Issue Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
BCBS Issues Climate Risk Principles while HKMA Expresses Its Support
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.