EIOPA published a paper that identifies, classifies, and provides a preliminary assessment of the potential additional tools and measures to enhance the macro-prudential framework for insurers in EU. This is the third paper in a series on systemic risk and macro-prudential policy in the insurance sector.
This third paper in the series builds on, and supplements, the previous ones by performing an initial assessment of additional potential tools or measures to be included in a macro-prudential framework designed for insurers. The aim of this exercise is to mitigate the sources of systemic risk and contribute to the achievement of the operational objectives. EIOPA conducted an analysis focusing on the four categories of tools: capital and reserving-based tools, liquidity-based tools, exposure-based tools, and preemptive planning. The paper describes the potential instruments or measures that have been identified for each category and offers preliminary analysis for each tool. It examines the way in which the tools in each category contribute to achieving one or more of the operational objectives identified in previous papers and offers preliminary conclusions. The paper focuses on whether a specific instrument should or should not be further considered. This is an important aspect in light of the future work in the context of the Solvency II review. The initial assessment should be understood as a first step of the process and not yet as a formal proposal.
The first paper in this series was published in 2017 and it identified and analyzed the sources of systemic risk in insurance. The second paper was published in March 2018 and it identified, classified, and provided a preliminary assessment of the already existing tools or measures in the Solvency II framework that could mitigate any of the previously identified systemic risk sources. Through this paper series, EIOPA intends to ensure that any further extension of the debate on systemic risk and macro-prudential policy to the insurance sector fully reflects the specific nature of the industry.
- Press Release
- Third Paper: Enhancing Macro-Prudential Framework (PDF)
- Second Paper: Solvency II Tools with Macro-Prudential Impact (PDF)
- First Paper: Systemic Risk and Macro-Prudential Policy (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Systemic Risk, Macro-prudential Framework, Solvency II, EIOPA
Previous ArticleEBA and ESMA Issue Statement on Retail Holdings of Bail-In-Able Debt
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).