EBA published an update to the Joint Committee guidelines on complaints-handling. The update includes an extension of the scope of application of these guidelines to the authorities supervising the new institutions established under the revised Payment Service Directive (PSD2) and the Mortgage Credit Directive (MCD).
This extension will ensure that an identical set of requirements for complaints-handling continues to apply to all financial institutions across the banking, investment, and insurance sectors. This will provide consumers with the same level of protection, irrespective of which regulated product or service they are purchasing and which regulated institution they are purchasing it from. The Joint Committee Guidelines are addressed to authorities competent in their jurisdictions for supervising complaints-handling by firms, which in the banking sector include credit institutions, payment institutions, and electronic money institutions, as defined in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), the PSD2, and the Electronic Money Directive (EMD), respectively. The scope of the application of the Joint Committee Guidelines will be extended as of May 01, 2019 to the authorities competent for supervising complaints-handling by:
- Payment initiation service providers, which provide only payment initiation services
- Account information service providers (AISPs) benefiting from an exemption under Article 33 of PSD2, which provide only account information services
- Credit intermediaries under the MCD
- Non-credit institution creditors under the MCD
In case of AISPs, which provide only account information services, but no other payment services, EBA, in line with related requirements set out in the PSD2, confirmed that the guidelines will apply only to security-related complaints. EBA also clarified that all credit intermediaries should inform consumers about the procedures for submitting a complaint, although competent authorities should consider a general proportionality principle when applying guidelines to credit intermediaries that are sole traders. In relation to the specific case of credit intermediaries that are tied to, or work exclusively for, one creditor, EBA further clarified that these intermediaries can either handle complaints themselves or rely on the complaints-handling procedure of the creditor.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Complaints Handling Guidelines, CRD, PSD 2, MCD, EBA
BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.
PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.
PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
FCA announced proposals that would provide continued support for certain consumer credit products to users, who are facing a financial impact because of the exceptional circumstances arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR published a draft version of taxonomy RAN 1.4.0_PWD1, along with the related documentation, for Solvency II reporting.
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).