ESMA published a report on the peer review on the guidelines on Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and other Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (UCITS) issues. ESMA found that national regulators need to improve their supervision of UCITS engaging in efficient portfolio management techniques (EPM). ESMA will follow up on the findings of this peer review in 24 months to assess the progress made by the national competent authorities.
This report presents findings regarding compliance of the assessed national competent authorities with the guidelines, identifies good practices of supervisory tools and measures that may be of interest to other national competent authorities, and highlights areas where follow-up policy work may be considered by ESMA to take into account changes in the regulatory framework and to address open questions concerning the application of the guidelines. The peer review assessed six national competent authorities from Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg, and the United Kingdom. Based on the guidelines, besides identifying some good practices, ESMA found deficiencies in the national supervision of UCITS engaging in EPM. The findings of the peer review relate in particular to the supervisory practices regarding operational aspects of costs, fees, and revenues for EPM and collateral management issues. ESMA calls for national competent authorities to:
- Ensure a more systematic and formalized review of the required EPM disclosures, allowing investors to better understand funds’ EPM engagement, the risks involved, and the cost and fee policy concerning EPM. This finding is relevant for all reviewed national competent authorities and particularly for Estonia and the UK.
- Provide more comprehensive internal supervisory guidance on costs, fees, and revenues regarding EPM. This finding is relevant for all reviewed national competent authorities.
- Ensure that all net revenues from EPM are returned to the investors. This finding is particularly relevant for Germany and Luxembourg regarding revenue splits between investors, fund managers, and their service providers.
- Revise existing national exemptions to the guidelines on collateral requirements granted in the UK and Germany so that fund assets can only be used for EPM purposes where UCITS receive high-quality and liquid collateral, in accordance with the standards set out in the ESMA Guidelines.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, UCITS, ETFs, Guidelines, Peer Review, ESMA
BoE published a statistical notice (Notice 2020/9) explaining the approach for treatment of payment holidays on the profit and loss return or Form PL.
BoE updated the known issues document for the statistical reporting Forms AS and FV.
FED announced individual capital requirements for 34 large banks and these requirements go into effect on October 01, 2020.
SRB published a set of documents to give operational guidance to banks on implementation of the bail-in tool.
BIS published an update on the G20 TechSprint Initiative, which was launched in April 2020 and aims to highlight the potential for technologies to resolve regulatory compliance (regtech) and supervisory (suptech) challenges.
OSFI published a letter that provides an update on the milestones for the implementation of the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts.
EBA updated the report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies.
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
BCBS is consulting on the principles for operational resilience and the revisions to the principles for sound management of operational risk for banks.
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.