PRA published a note and graphic on the transition to v2.7 and v2.8 of the EBA FINREP taxonomy to assist firms in planning for their upcoming regulatory requirements. The PRA graphic explains when firms should transition to using v2.7 and v2.8 of the EBA reporting taxonomy for FINREP.
PRA appreciates that where firms align their FINREP reporting to their accounting reference date (ARD) this could cause confusion about when firms should report using v2.7, and then report using v2.8, as while firms’ implementation of v2.7 was generally aligned to their ARD, v2.8 has an implementation date of December 31, 2018. The graphic explains how firms can determine when they should use v2.7 and v2.8, based on their ARD, which will enable them to submit their reports via the correct entry point, avoiding submission issues.
In some cases firms should note that they may implement v2.8 shortly after implementation of v2.7; in rare cases, firms may not even need to submit any reports on v2.7 before moving onto v2.8. As v2.7 represents a significant change to the reporting compared with v2.6 whereas the migration from v2.7 to v2.8 represents only an incremental change, it follows that moving from v2.6 to v2.7 and then quickly to v2.8 will not be materially more burdensome than moving straight from v2.6 to v2.8. Additional resources required to implement v2.8 should only be incremental to those required for v2.7.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Reporting, FINREP, Taxonomy, Regulatory Requirements, PRA
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).