EBA published a report presenting the outcome of its assessment to the EC’s call for advice on the European Secured Notes (ESNs). In addition, it puts forward recommendations on key aspects for EC to consider when possibly designing the legislative framework for small and medium-size enterprises (SME) European Secured Notes.
SME European Secured Notes, similar to covered bonds, could be structured as a dual recourse instrument. Due to the high-risk profile of SME exposures, EBA suggests a more restrictive framework, especially with respect to the coverage, the liquidity, and the disclosure requirements and suggests strict eligibility criteria at both loan and pool level and a minimum level of over-collateralization of at least 30%. In terms of capital requirement, it is advised that no preferential treatment (that is, similar to covered bonds) is granted. However, a differentiated risk-weight treatment compared to unsecured notes could be considered subject to certain considerations.
EBA does not recommend the creation of an infrastructure European Secured Notes. A dual recourse structure for Infrastructure loans is not appropriate given the lack of granularity in a cover pool, the complexity of the loan structures and the specific and different nature of infrastructure projects making it very difficult to create a high quality dynamic cover pool of infrastructure loans. EBA recommends EC to investigate the case for a new distinct asset class for high-quality project finance loans in the form of a standardized EU infrastructure bond. Further EBA work would be needed to specify the features and the applicable framework for this potential new product. This contribution will provide input into the EC's considerations on the further development of the Capital Markets Union project.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, European Secured Notes, Covered Bonds, EBA
Previous ArticleEIOPA Publishes Risk Dashboard for the First Quarter of 2018
PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
EIOPA published the financial stability report that provides detailed quantitative and qualitative assessment of the key risks identified for the insurance and occupational pensions sectors in the European Economic Area.
EBA published its risk dashboard for the first quarter of 2020 together with the results of the risk assessment questionnaire.
EBA announced that the next stress testing exercise is expected to be launched at the end of January 2021 and its results are to be published at the end of July 2021.
PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II.
MAS published a statement guidance on dividend distribution by banks.
APRA updated its capital management guidance for banks, particularly easing restrictions around paying dividends as institutions continue to manage the disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany.
EBA issued a statement reminding financial institutions that the transition period between EU and UK will expire on December 31, 2020; this will end the possibility for the UK-based financial institutions to offer financial services to EU customers on a cross-border basis via passporting.
SRB published guidance on operational continuity in resolution and financial market infrastructure (FMI) contingency plans.