ESMA fined five banks for issuing credit ratings without authorization from ESMA and issued five public notices for these banks negligently breaching the Credit Rating Agencies Regulation (CRAR). These banks are Danske Bank, Nordea Bank, SEB, Svenska Handelsbanken, and Swedbank and they were fined EUR 495,000 each (collectively EUR 2.48 million).
Between June 2011 and August 2016, the five banks issued credit research to their clients—and SEB continued to do so until May 2018. This credit research included the issuance of what the banks described as shadow ratings. These reports related to different entities and underlying financial instruments. These reports included opinions, which ESMA found met the definition of a credit rating provided for by the CRAR. However, no bank had acquired the necessary ESMA authorization to issue ratings and such conduct infringes the CRAR, which requires prior authorization. The individual fine amounts take into account the aggravating factor that the banks had committed the infringement for more than six months but also consider the mitigating factor that each bank has voluntarily taken measures to ensure that similar infringements could not be committed in the future. The five banks mentioned above may appeal against this decision to the Board of Appeal of the ESAs. Such an appeal does not suspend the fine, although it is possible for the Board of Appeal to suspend the application of the decision in accordance with the CRAR.
Under the CRAR, issuing credit ratings requires authorization by ESMA to ensure that such ratings are independent, objective, and of adequate quality and that Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) are subject to the same rules and oversight across all EU countries. A firm, to be registered as a CRA in EU, needs to provide proof that it fulfills the necessary organizational requirements and provides adequate safeguards, in particular regarding governance, conflicts of interests, internal controls, rating process and methodologies, business activities, and disclosures. A failure by a firm to apply for registration prior to issuing ratings is an infringement of the CRAR. None of the five banks was, or is, registered as a CRA nor had they applied for registration. Currently, there are 27 CRAs authorized by ESMA to issue credit ratings within the EU.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, CRA Regulation, CRA, Enforcement Decisions, ESMA
Previous ArticleESMA Updates Q&As on the Application of UCITS Directive and AIFMD
APRA updated the lists of the Direct to APRA (D2A) validation and derivation rules for authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation entities.
EC adopted a package that includes the digital finance and retail payments strategies and the legislative proposals for regulatory frameworks on crypto-assets and digital operational resilience.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/22) on proposals for regulations amending the securitization framework of EU, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
FCA is consulting on its approach to the authorization and supervision of international firms operating in UK.
MAS published amendments to Notice 637 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements for reporting banks incorporated in Singapore.
FCA announced that it will move firms to RegData from Gabriel in the coming months in stages, based on the reporting requirements of firms.
ISDA issued a letter to regulators to flag that it now expects the supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions and the Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) Fallbacks Protocol to be effective around mid- to late-January 2021.
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.