CPMI and IOSCO published the fifth update to the Level 1 assessments of implementation monitoring of the Principles for financial market infrastructures (PFMI). The update is based on self-assessments by individual jurisdictions of how they have adopted the 24 PFMIs and four of the five Responsibilities for authorities. Overall, the results show that jurisdictions are making progress on implementing international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
Further progress has been made among some participating jurisdictions that had not completed their implementation measures at the time of the 2017 update. Twenty-one of the 28 jurisdictions have completed the implementation of measures for all Financial Market Infrastructure types, compared to 20 in the previous update. Of the eight jurisdictions (Argentina, Chile, Indonesia, Korea, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, South Africa,and the U.S.) that had not self-attested to full implementation of the Principles for all FMI types as reported in the previous update, four (Chile, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and the U.S.) have reported improved ratings for the current, fifth update, with one jurisdiction (Mexico) now reporting full implementation status. Four jurisdictions (Argentina, Indonesia, Korea, and South Africa) reported no change in their ratings.
This report reflects the status of jurisdictions' legal, regulatory, or policy frameworks as of January 01, 2018 and will be the last published report of the Level 1 assessments. Future updates will be published on the CPMI and IOSCO websites in an online format. The CPMI and IOSCO continue to monitor the completeness of jurisdictions' implementation measures, their consistency with the PFMI, and the consistency in the outcomes of such frameworks (Level 2 and 3 assessments). Jurisdictions rated their level of implementation using the following four-point scale:
- 1: draft implementation measures are not published
- 2: draft implementation measures are published
- 3: final implementation measures are published but are not yet in force
- 4: final implementation measures are in force
- NA: no implementation measures are needed
Keywords: International, PMI, Banking, PFMI, FMI, Implementation Monitoring, CPMI, IOSCO
Previous ArticleFSB Completes Peer Review of Hong Kong
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.