General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
July 19, 2018

IMF issued reports presenting findings from the surveillance of financial sector policies in the Euro area. The published documents include the staff report and the selected issues report under the 2018 Article IV consultation, the financial system stability assessment (FSSA) report, and several technical notes under the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP). The technical notes are on detailed assessment of observance (DAO) of Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision (BCPs); stress testing the banking sector; bank resolution and crisis management; systemic liquidity management; systemic risk analysis; insurance, investment firm, and macro-prudential oversight; and supervision and oversight of central counterparties (CCPs) and central securities depositories (CSDs).

The FSSA reveals that the resilience of large euro area banks has improved, but important vulnerabilities remain. Capital buffers are, in aggregate, sizable relative to the immediate threats, but some banks are especially vulnerable to credit risk and others to market risks. The banking system has ample liquidity, against a backdrop of ECB support. Risks to financial stability relate mainly to tighter financial conditions, weaker growth, and policy and geopolitical uncertainties. The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU (Brexit) could potentially disrupt financial market and services and thus the wider economy. Also, policy reversals could hurt debt sustainability and test the cohesion of policy making in EU. Overall, banking supervision in the euro area has improved significantly following the creation of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM). A detailed assessment against BCPs finds that SSM has established its operational independence and effectiveness, intensifying supervision while harmonizing at a high level. SSM has also implemented sophisticated risk analysis in the process of setting capital targets for individual institutions.

Nonetheless, banking supervision continues to face important challenges, mostly related to resources, liquidity risk, credit risk, and the fragmentation of national laws. Supervision would be more effective in case of more assured continuity in the assignment of suitable resources provided by national competent authorities. Gauging in real time the evolving capacity of a weak bank to cope with potential liquidity strains is essential. Addressing the persistence of nonperforming loans (NPLs) in some member countries must remain a supervisory priority. Beyond that, common definitions of NPL, minimum standards for insolvency and creditor rights, and rules for valuation of collateral would accelerate resolution of NPLs. Gaps and fragmentation in areas such as fit and proper criteria, major acquisitions, related party transactions, country risk, and sanctions need to be addressed while minimizing divergence at the national level. Divergences from international standards should also be eliminated. In addition, further efforts are needed to ensure effective coordination of prudential supervision with the oversight of anti-money laundering structures.

The assessment highlights that financial oversight of the nonbank financial sector is likewise being strengthened. More centralized oversight of financial market infrastructure by ESMA and ECB is warranted, given the systemic nature of the entities involved. Macro-prudential policy will have to become more adept at addressing risks related to cross-border flows and nonbank sources of financing as the financial system evolves. Bank crisis preparedness and management have been substantially upgraded, but here too the regime remains fragmented. The adoption of the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) and Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation (SRMR), along with the creation of the SSM and the Single Resolution Mechanism, provide a foundation for dealing with problem banks. The bank crisis preparedness and management framework faces significant transitional and structural challenges. A critical transitional challenge is the buildup of bail-in-able financing (known as MREL), which should be expedited, prioritizing large banks. Effective resolution will depend in part on the ready availability of adequate financial resources; thus, it is essential to make fully operational the Single Resolution Fund, to designate the European Stability Mechanism as its backstop, and establish a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS).

 

Related Links

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, PMI, FSSA, Article IV, Technical Notes, FSAP, IMF

Related Articles
News

FASB Issues Minor Improvements to Financial Instruments Standards

FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU No. 2019-04) that clarifies and improves areas of guidance related to the recently issued standards on credit losses (Topic 326), derivatives and hedging (Topic 815), and recognition and measurement of financial instruments (Topic 825).

April 25, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Grants License to New Authorized Deposit-Taking Institution

APRA announced that it has granted Judo Bank Pty Ltd a license to operate as an authorized deposit-taking institution without restrictions, under the Banking Act 1959.

April 24, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BoE Report on Evaluation of Approach to Concurrent Stress Testing

BoE published a report on the evaluation, by the Independent Evaluation Office (IEO), of the effectiveness of the approach of BoE to concurrent stress testing.

April 24, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FDIC Consults on Approach to Resolution Planning for IDIs

FDIC approved an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) and is seeking comment on ways to tailor and improve its rule requiring certain insured depository institutions (IDIs) to submit resolution plans.

April 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FDIC Specifies Submission Timeline for FFIEC 031, 041, and 051 Reports

FDIC published the financial institution letters (FIL-21-2019 and FIL-22-2019) that offer guidance on submission of Call Reports FFIEC 051, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 031 for the first quarter of 2019.

April 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Propose to Revise Call Reports FFIEC 031, 041, and 051

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) proposed to revise and extend, for three years, the Call Reports FFIEC 031, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 051.

April 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Propose to Amend Rule on Supplementary Leverage Ratio

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) are proposing to revise the capital requirements for supplementary leverage ratio, as required by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

April 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EIOPA Held InsurTech Roundtable on Use of Cloud Computing by Insurers

EIOPA had, on April 11, 2019, hosted its Fourth InsurTech Roundtable on the use of cloud computing by insurance undertakings.

April 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EP Resolution on Proposal for Sovereign Bond Backed Securities

The European Parliament (EP) published adopted text on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on sovereign bond-backed securities (SBBS).

April 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

HKMA Decides to Maintain Countercyclical Capital Buffer at 2.5%

HKMA announced that, in accordance with the Banking (Capital) Rules, the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) ratio for Hong Kong remains at 2.5%.

April 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2957