EC published its communication, to the European Parliament and the Council, to provide guidance on the existing EU rules for treatment of cross-border EU investments. The EC communication will help to prevent member states from adopting measures that infringe EU rules and assist investors in invoking their rights before administrations and national courts. It will also help legal practitioners to apply the EU rules. Additionally, EC published questions and answers (Q&A) on the communication issued by EC.
The communication aims to strengthen the business environment for EU investors. This is a crucial element in supporting more investment in the EU Single Market. EU investors can no longer rely on intra-EU bilateral investment treaties (intra-EU BITs). As EC has consistently stated, these treaties are illegal because they overlap with the EU single market rules and discriminate between EU investors. The communication provides the following clarifications:
- The free movement of capital, services, goods, and workers in the EU Single Market are fundamental freedoms for EU individuals. They give companies and citizens the right to establish a business, invest in a company, and provide services and goods across European borders. EU investors are also protected by general principles of non-discrimination, proportionality, legal certainty, and protection of legitimate expectations.
- Investor-State arbitration between a member state and an investor from another member state is incompatible with the EU law, including through intra-EU BITs. EU law already offers a comprehensive and effective legal framework, including remedies, to intra-EU investors when they invest in another member state.
- The EU law allows for markets to be regulated to pursue legitimate public interests such as public security, public health, social rights, consumer protection, or the preservation of the environment, which may have negative consequences for investors. Public authorities of EU and the member states have a duty and a responsibility to protect investments and to regulate markets. Therefore, EU and member states may take legitimate measures to protect those interests.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, Cross-border Investments, Capital Markets Union, Q&A, Guidance, EC
Previous ArticleEC Publishes Communication on Preparing for Withdrawal of UK from EU
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.