July 18, 2018

Randal K. Quarles of FED spoke at the American Bankers Association Summer Leadership Meeting in Utah. He established that the FED will need to revise its prudential framework to allow for a greater differentiation in the supervision and regulation of large firms, as stipulated by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCP Act).

Mr. Quarles stated that, in late May, the Congress enacted the EGRRCP Act, which directs FED to further tailor the supervision and regulation of large banks with more than USD 100 billion in assets. In this context, he first described the ways in which FED has already tailored regulations to the largest and most complex banks since the global financial crisis. However, he said, “…we still have more to do to streamline our framework in a manner that more directly addresses firm-specific risks.” In applying enhanced prudential standards for firms with total assets of more than USD 100 billion, the Congress requires FED to consider not only size but also capital structure, riskiness, complexity, financial activities, and any other factors FED deems relevant. While similar factors are being used to calibrate the largest firms' global systemically important bank (G-SIB) surcharges, they have not been used more holistically to tailor the overall supervision and regulation of large banks that do not qualify as G-SIBs. Additionally, consistent with the legislation's tailoring requirements, FED must proactively consider how firms with more than USD 250 billion in assets that do not qualify as G-SIBs may be more efficiently regulated by applying more tailored standards. In conjunction with changing the regulations, FED also needs to consider how such changes would be reflected in supervisory programs, guidance, and regulatory reporting.

Supervisors need to balance providing appropriate relief to firms with ensuring that firms are maintaining resources and risk-management practices so they can be resilient under a range of conditions. He believes that FED should make it a near-term priority to issue a proposed rule on tailoring of enhanced prudential standards for large banking firms. This proposal, subject to notice and comment, would address the statutory obligations under the recent legislation by proposing to tailor enhanced prudential standards in a manner that recognizes relative complexity and interconnectedness among large banks. “The statute sets an eighteen-month deadline for this regulatory process, but we can and will move much more rapidly than this,” said Mr. Quarles. Following are the key highlights of the changes under consideration by FED, according to Mr. Quarles: 

  • In terms of capital requirements, both risk-based and leverage capital requirements should remain core components of regulation for large firms with more than USD 100 billion in total assets. The already proposed stress capital buffer, if finalized, would also be critical for large firms. However, FED could consider a number of changes for less complex and less interconnected firms related to their capital requirements. For example, such firms, even if above USD 250 billion in assets, could have less frequent company-run stress tests. Additionally, less complex and less interconnected firms could be exempted from requirements to calculate risk-weighted assets under the models-based advanced approaches to capital.
  • He strongly believes that liquidity regulation should be a primary component of supervision and regulation of large banks. Minimum standardized liquidity measures and internal liquidity stress tests remain critical for firms with more than USD 100 billion in total assets. However, for less complex and less interconnected firms with assets greater than USD 100 billion, there may be opportunities to modify aspects of the standardized liquidity requirements as well as expectations around internal liquidity stress tests and liquidity risk management. Similarly, banks with more than USD 250 billion in assets that are not G-SIBs currently face largely the same liquidity regulation as G-SIBs. It would make sense to calibrate the liquidity requirements differently for these firms relative to their G-SIB counterparts.
  • He also mentioned the possibility of scaling back or entirely removing the resolution planning requirements for most of the firms with total assets between USD 100 billion and USD 250 billion that do not pose a high degree of resolvability risk, especially if they are less complex and less interconnected. He suggested that FED should consider limiting the scope of application of resolution planning requirements to only the largest, most complex, and most interconnected banking firms because their failure poses the greatest spillover risks to the broader economy. For firms that would still be subject to resolution planning requirements, FED could reduce the frequency and burden of such requirements, perhaps by requiring more-targeted resolution plans.

 

Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, EGRRCP Act, Proportionality, G-SIBs, FED

Related Articles
News

PRA Finalizes Reporting Amendments to Pillar 2 Liquidity Framework

PRA published the final Policy Statement PS13/19 on regulatory reporting amendments and clarifications to the Pillar 2 liquidity framework for banks in UK.

June 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IAIS Consults on Revisions to IAIS Supervisory Material

IAIS has launched a public consultation on revisions to the IAIS supervisory material.

June 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IMF Paper on Implementing Prudential Standards in Developing Economies

IMF published a working paper that provides practical guidance on how developing economies, including non-Basel Committee member countries, could incorporate international standards into their prudential framework.

June 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for June 2019

EBA published answers to five questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

June 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSB Releases Update on Meeting of Regional Consultative Group for Asia

FSB published an update on the meeting of its Regional Consultative Group (RCG) for Asia.

June 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BoE, FCA, and MAS Announce Collaboration on Cyber Security

MAS and UK financial authorities (BoE and FCA) announced that they will work together to strengthen cyber security in their financial sectors.

June 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

CBIRC Advisory Committee Holds Meeting, Discusses Regulatory Issues

The first meeting of the International Advisory Committee (IAC) of CBIRC was held in Shanghai from June 11 to 12, 2019.

June 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ECB and EIOPA Publish Common Minimum Standards for Data Revision in EU

ECB and EIOPA published the common minimum standards for supervisory and statistical reporting data by the undertakings in EU.

June 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IMF Reports on 2019 Article IV Consultation with Czech Republic

IMF published its staff report and selected issues report under the 2019 Article IV consultation with Czech Republic.

June 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Response to Proposal on Revisions to Capital Framework for Banks

APRA published a paper in response to the first round of consultation on proposed changes to the capital framework for authorized deposit-taking institutions.

June 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3252