General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
July 16, 2018

FSI published a report that examines the experience of early users with the use of innovative technology by supervisory agencies (suptech) to support supervision. The report first describes the uses of suptech. It then examines user experiences with suptech covering how and why do supervisory agencies develop suptech applications, the challenges that supervisory agencies face in developing suptech applications, and the implications of suptech for supervised entities. Finally, the paper presents useful insights that could help supervisory agencies take advantage of suptech developments.

The report highlights that suptech is currently found in two areas of applications: data collection and data analytics. Supervisory agencies initiate and organize their suptech activities in several ways. The challenges faced by agencies in developing or using suptech applications include computational capacity constraints; increased operational risks, including cyber risk; data quality; finding the right talent, management support, and buy-in from supervision units; rigid rules in project management; and lack of transparency in some of the data analytics applications. The benefits of suptech applications can extend to supervised institutions. They can lead to reduced compliance costs and contribute to enhanced risk management effectiveness. This is particularly the case for automated reporting. 

Supervisory agencies would be best placed to explore the potential benefits of suptech applications if they have a well-defined suptech strategy. A suptech strategy should comprise the following three key elements, at a minimum:

  • Ambitious, but achievable, targets (for example, which technology will be used, in which area of supervision, and how will it be funded)
  • An assessment of data availability, data quality, and availability of analytical resources
  • A step-by-step action plan on how the supervisory agency will get from the current situation to full implementation of its suptech strategy

The experience of early suptech users, as discussed here, yields some useful insights on how to develop such a strategy. The overall approach to supervision should adapt to the digitization of the activities of supervised entities. As finance becomes increasingly digitised, financial supervision needs to keep up.


Related Link: FSI Paper (PDF)

Keywords: International, Banking, Suptech, Regtech, Suptech Strategy, FSI

Related Insights

HKMA Announces Intention to Consult on Updated BCBS Disclosure Rules

HKMA announced that it will consult the industry in due course on the relevant implementation proposal to give effect to the disclosure requirements of the December 2018 package by BCBS.

December 17, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

US Agencies Propose Derivative Counterparty Credit Exposure Framework

US Agencies (OCC, FED, and FDIC) proposed to implement a new approach for calculating the exposure amount of derivative contracts under the regulatory capital rule.

December 17, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

HKMA Issues and Revises Reporting Forms Under the IRRBB Framework

HKMA issued a revised version of the Supervisory Policy Manual (SPM) IR-1, with an updated title “Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book” (IRRBB).

December 14, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for December 2018

EBA published answers to six questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

December 14, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

OSFI Proposes Changes to Guideline on Large Exposure Limits

OSFI proposed revisions to the Guideline B-2 on Large Exposure Limits, for implementation in the first quarter of 2020.

December 13, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Consults on Disclosure Rules for Leverage Ratio Window-Dressing

BCBS published a consultative document on revisions to the leverage ratio disclosure requirements to address the leverage ratio window-dressing behavior.

December 13, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Updates the Policy on Approach to Systemic Risk Buffer

PRA published the final Statement of Policy on the PRA approach to the implementation of the systemic risk buffer (SRB), as proposed in the consultation paper CP29/18.

December 13, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

EP Report Examines Financial Supervision and Regulation in US

European Parliament published a report that provides a concise overview of the Dodd-Frank Act, the challenges of its implementation, and efforts to roll back the Act, in large part due to what are viewed to be vague and impractical provisions.

December 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

FED Proposes to Revise Several Reporting Forms Including FR Y-9C

FED proposed to extend for three years, with revision, the FR Y-9, FR Y-7N, FR Y-11, and FR 2314 family of reports, in addition to the forms FR 2886b, FR Y-8, FR 2248, FR 2320, FR 2644, and FR 2886b.

December 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Finalizes Guidelines on the STS Criteria in Securitization

EBA published the final guidelines that provide a harmonized interpretation of the criteria for a securitization to be eligible as simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) on a cross-sectoral basis throughout EU.

December 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2340