General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
July 13, 2018

ECB published a working paper that investigates the costs and benefits of liquidity regulation. The authors find that liquidity tools are beneficial but cannot completely remove the need for Lender of Last Resort (LOLR) interventions by the central bank.

The paper investigated the extent to which the two main liquidity ratios (Liquidity Coverage Ratio, or LCR, and the Net Stable Funding Ratio, or NSFR) might have been effective in reducing liquidity take-up by European banks during the post-Lehman crisis as well as the European Sovereign Debt crisis. It was found that full compliance with the current LCR and NSFR rules would have reduced banks’ reliance on publicly provided liquidity during the global financial crisis, without removing such assistance altogether. Nevertheless, the evidence also suggested that liquidity regulations (at least as currently specified) would not have prevented the need for large public liquidity assistance for European banks. The empirical results, therefore, pointed to caution against expecting the end of LOLR interventions due to the application of the current liquidity policy tools. 

The authors estimated the cost for banks of complying with the LCR and NSFR and found that these costs turn out to be non-trivial but small, especially when compared with the costs of capital requirements. When the introduction of the LCR and NSFR was simulated in two structural macro-financial models, it was found that the regulations would lead to relatively modest declines in lending and real activity. The analysis, therefore, suggested that while the LCR and NSFR do not have financial stability benefits on a par with bank capital requirements, they are still useful due to their relatively low cost. 

 

Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Liquidity Risk, LCR, NSFR, Basel III, ECB

 

Related Articles
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for March 2019

EBA published answers to seven questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

March 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OCC Updates Recovery Planning Booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook

OCC updated the Recovery Planning booklet of the Comptroller’s Handbook.

March 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Publishes Report on Convergence of Supervisory Practices Across EU

EBA published annual report on the convergence of supervisory practices in EU.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

CPMI-IOSCO Publish Update to Level 1 Assessment of PFMI Implementation

CPMI and IOSCO jointly updated the Level 1 Assessment Online Tracker on monitoring of the implementation of the Principles for financial market infrastructures (PFMI).

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

Agustín Carstens of BIS Speaks About New Role of Central Banks

While speaking at the 20th anniversary conference of the Financial Stability Institute (FSI), Agustín Carstens, the General Manager of BIS, highlighted the need for regulatory actions in light of the continued evolution of financial technology.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Publishes Policy Statement on Group Supervision Under Solvency II

PRA published a policy statement (PS9/19) that provides feedback on responses to the consultation paper CP15/18 and the final supervisory statement SS9/15 (Appendix) on group supervision under Solvency II.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ECB Announces Start Date for Euro Short-Term Rate

ECB announced that it will start publishing the euro short-term rate (€STR) as of October 02, 2019, reflecting the trading activity of October 01, 2019.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Proposes to Update the Pillar 2 Capital Framework for Banks

PRA is proposing (CP5/19) to update the Pillar 2 capital framework to reflect continued refinements and developments in setting the PRA buffer (Pillar 2B).

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Publishes Policy Statement Related to Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published a policy statement (PS8/19) that contains the final policy in the updated supervisory statement SS17/13 on credit risk mitigation (Appendix 1) as well as the statement SS31/15 on Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process or SREP (Appendix 2).

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Updates Supplemental Information and Q&A for Form FR Y-14

FED updated the supplemental instructions and the questions and answers (Q&A) document for the information collection on capital assessments and stress testing, which is covered by the reporting form FR Y-14A.

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2750