ESMA updated question and answer (Q&A) documents on the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), temporary product intervention measures of ESMA in relation to contracts for differences (CFDs) and binary options, and the implementation of investor protection topics under the Market in Financial Instruments Directive and Regulation (MiFID II/MiFIR).
The updates include the following:
- Q&A on EMIR— The updates cover amendments to the existing General Q&A on identification of counterparties to a derivative, also confirming that a portfolio manager could be a counterparty to a derivative when entering into a derivative on its own account and own behalf. It also includes amendments to the existing trade repositories Q&A on Legal Entity Identifier (LEI), which simplify the description of the existing process. The amendments also explain other processes trade repositories should follow in scenarios where the reports must be updated in relation to the LEI. A new case for reporting derivatives has also been added to the Part IV of the Q&A, which explains the procedure for reporting to trade repositories in a transaction scenario involving portfolio management companies.
- Q&A on product intervention measures—ESMA updated Q&A on temporary product intervention measures of ESMA on the marketing, distribution or sale of CFDs and binary options to retail clients based on Article 40 of MiFIR. The Q&A provides clarification on the application of the temporary product intervention measures on clients established outside the Union and non-Union nationals.
- Q&A on MiFID/MiFIR—The updates include new Q&As on the topics of inducements (research) and provision of investment services by thir- country firms. The overall MiFID II Q&A provide clarifications on topics such as best execution, suitability and appropriateness, post-sale reporting, record keeping, and investment advice on an independent basis.
The Q&A mechanism is a practical convergence tool used to promote common supervisory approaches and practices. It is intended to help investors and other market participants by providing clarity on the regulatory requirements.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, EMIR, MiFID/MiFIR, Product Intervention Measures, Q&A, Investor Protection, ESMA
Previous ArticleVicky Saporta of BoE Speaks on Future of Prudential Bank Regulation
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).