Featured Product

    BoE Statement on SRB and Pillar 2A in Stress Test Hurdle Rates

    July 12, 2018

    BoE published a statement providing details on two changes to the way hurdle rates are calculated in the annual stress test. These changes are only relevant to firms under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). In its document on the key elements of the 2018 stress test, which was published in March 2018, BoE had noted its intention to change the way hurdle rates are calculated in the annual stress test in four ways.

    The two changes on which the statement provides details are as follows:

    • Hurdle rates will incorporate buffers to capture domestic systemic importance as well as global systemic importance.
    • The calculation of minimum capital requirements incorporated in the hurdle rates will more accurately reflect how they would evolve in a real stress.

    The Systemic Risk Buffer (SRB) increases the capacity of certain UK systemic banks to absorb stress, reflecting their significance for the domestic economy. Beginning in 2019, SRB rates will be set for ring-fenced banks (RFB) and large building societies by PRA. For the purpose of the 2018 stress test, in calculating these uplifts to firms’ hurdle rates, PRA will assume the following SRB rates for the SRB institutions: 1% for Barclays, 1% for HSBC, 2.5% for Lloyds Banking Group, 1% for Nationwide, 1.5% for RBS, and 1% for Santander UK. These are assumed rates for the concurrent stress-test purposes only. Actual SRB rates for affected firms will be determined and published for the first time in 2019.

    The annual stress test uses a risk-weighted hurdle rate, including Pillar 2A, which is a minimum capital requirement applied to cover a range of risks not (or not adequately) captured in Pillar 1. In the previous stress tests, the Pillar 2A element of the hurdle rate had been set as a constant share of risk-weighted assets over the five-year stress horizon. To ensure that the Pillar 2A requirements in the 2018 stress test more closely reflect the probable impact of stress on the risks captured in Pillar 2A, the Prudential Regulation Committee (PRC) has developed an approach in which each Pillar 2A risk component scales with a simple metric. This approach will preserve the current simplicity in the calculation of hurdle rates. These scaling bases are not intended to be forward guidance on how PRA will set Pillar 2A requirements in such a scenario; rather, they provide a simple way to ensure Pillar 2A requirements in the stress test more closely reflect the probable impact of the stress on the risks captured in Pillar 2A.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Systemic Risk Buffer, Pillar 2A, Stress Testing, Stress Test 2018, Hurdle Rates, BoE

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    FASB Proposes to Delay Implementation of Insurance Contracts Standard

    FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update that would grant insurance companies, adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, an additional year to implement the Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-12 on targeted improvements to accounting for long-duration insurance contracts, or LDTI (Topic 944).

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Calls on Resolution Authorities to Consider Impact of COVID Crisis

    EBA published a statement on resolution planning in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Updates Reporting Manual on European Single Electronic Format

    ESMA updated the reporting manual on the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework

    BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework

    July 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Statement on Application of Matching Adjustment Amid Crisis

    PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.

    July 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Provides Clarity on Implementation of Certain COVID-19 Policies

    EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.

    July 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Consults on Revision of Network and Information Systems Directive

    EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.

    July 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Statement on LIBOR Transition and PRA Resolution-Related Rules

    PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.

    July 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Issues Updates to Pillar 2A Capital Framework in UK

    PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.

    July 06, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Report Examines Progress on Adoption of Basel III Framework

    BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.

    July 06, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5448