RBNZ published the results of the 2017 stress tests of major banks. The detailed results from the 2017 stress test exercise involve the four largest banks in New Zealand: ANZ Bank New Zealand, ASB Bank, Bank of New Zealand, and Westpac New Zealand. RBNZ also published its approach for using the stress tests to monitor the stability of the financial system.
Outcomes from the test suggest that the four banks would be able to maintain capital levels above their minimum requirements during these scenarios. Repricing actions to maintain relatively stable net interest income and low operating expenses mean that these banks would be able to offset large losses on their credit portfolios and from the misconduct event with their underlying earnings. There are, however, uncertainties around the magnitude of losses banks may face in a real downturn scenario and the extent to which banks would be able to restore their interest margins. As a result, the outcomes remain sensitive to the modeling assumptions used in the test. The stress tests modeled a severe macroeconomic downturn scenario and an operational risk event related to mortgage lending misconduct.
In feedback on their performance in the 2017 test, RBNZ encouraged further improvements in banks’ ability to assess how stress test results vary depending on modeling assumptions, and emphasized the importance of providing sufficient context around these sensitivities when discussing stress test outcomes with senior management and directors. Stress test results are also an input to the calibration of capital requirements, which are currently under review. RBNZ expects banks to be well-capitalized, so they can continue providing credit to the economy even under severe stress scenarios.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, New Zealand, Banking, Stress Testing, Banking Supervision, 2017 Stress Test, RBNZ
Previous ArticleCBB Proposes and Finalizes Rulebook Modules for Banks in August 2018
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).