BoE, FCA, and PRA jointly published a discussion paper on strengthening the operational resilience of financial services (FS) firms. The discussion paper is intended to share the thinking of supervisory authorities regarding operational resilience and obtain feedback. Responses should be submitted by October 05, 2018.
The paper explains why the supervisory authorities consider that managing operational resilience is most effectively addressed by focusing on business services, rather than on systems and processes. It also explains that financial stability rests on the operational resilience of individual firms, financial market infrastructure (FMI), and the system as a whole. The paper then suggests that the boards and senior management of firms and FMIs would set their own tolerances for operational disruption, on the assumption that that some or all supporting systems and processes will fail. Next, it expands the idea that firms and FMIs would develop impact tolerances for important business services; it explains how supervisors could gain assurance that firms and FMIs ensure the continuity of their most important business services and that boards and senior management are sufficiently engaged. Finally, the paper summarizes some of the key concepts set out in the discussion paper and provides a complete list of the discussion questions.
Operational disruptions to the products and services that firms and FMIs provide have the potential to cause harm to consumers and market participants, threaten the viability of firms and FMIs, and cause instability in the financial system. The discussion paper focuses on how the provision of these products and services can be maintained. Operational resilience refers to the ability of firms, FMIs, and the sector as a whole to prevent, respond to, recover, and learn from operational disruptions.
Comment Due Date: October 05, 2018
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, PMI, FMI, Operational Resilience, Business Continuity, FCA, PRA, BoE
Previous ArticleESMA Publishes Technical Advice Under the Prospectus Regulation
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.