IOSCO proposed the good or sound practices to assist relevant storage infrastructures and their oversight bodies to identify and address issues that could affect pricing of commodity derivatives and in turn affect market integrity and efficiency. IOSCO proposes the adoption of the good or sound practices by all relevant storage infrastructures, their oversight bodies, and financial regulators in IOSCO member jurisdictions, as appropriate to their role and activities. Comments should be submitted on or before August 29, 2018.
Instead of prohibiting certain behavior, these practices are intended to create a framework that motivates the market to adopt best practices and self-correct. The report builds on the 2016 report of IOSCO on the impact of storage and delivery infrastructure on derivatives market pricing, which identified certain commodities storage and delivery situations that have the potential to affect derivatives pricing, if not properly addressed. These practices fall into five broad areas including oversight, transparency, conflicts of interest, fees and incentives, and operations. The report published for consultation sets out various potential good or sound practices to address the issues identified in each of the five areas.
Comment Due Date: August 29, 2018
Keywords: International, Securities, Commodity Derivatives, Storage Infrastructure, Good Practices, IOSCO
Previous ArticleSNB Updates Reporting Forms for Capital Adequacy Under Basel III
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.